Re "Utah TV viewers continue to abandon KSL Ch. 5" (Tribune, March 3):
A front-page article about KSL television's loss of ratings? Really? I am amazed that you would think this is an appropriate hard-news story.
And just what did anyone learn from it? First, KSL-TV's news has dropped in ratings by one company's rating system, and only the ratings for one show. We also learned what ratings mean to a television station.
Oh, there was also a blow-by-blow accounting of all that has happened to cause KSL's ratings slide. Of course there have been mistakes. Every company makes them even KUTV.
Where was The Tribune when KUTV fell into ruin in the 1990s? I don't remember that making front-page news.
Finally, there was the "editor's note" regarding the relationship between The Tribune and KUTV. What a surprise!
I hope other readers saw this article for what it was intended to do further pull down a distinguished and honorable news-gathering organization.
A better place for such fluff would have been inside your Monday morning, reduced-in-size (due to an attempt to save money) edition. By the way, how are you all doing with readership?
Salt Lake City