A few years back, a certain politician was castigated for supporting construction of an unneeded bridge in Alaska — the infamous "bridge to nowhere."
One would think that a savvy politician such as Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, would remember this example before stepping into the nuclear boondoogle that is his proposed SB199 ("Ratepayers would help Utah go nuclear," Tribune, Feb. 19).
![]() |
Join the Discussion |
![]() |
Post a Comment |
SB199, Bramble’s favor to his former legislative colleague-turned-nuclear-entrepreneur Aaron Tilton, is Utah’s own bridge to nowhere. This scheme forces utility customers to help pay for Tilton’s proposed nuclear reactor in the middle of the southern Utah desert. Bramble’s bill would obligate ratepayers like you, me and your grandmother on a fixed income to pay for a poorly managed project that’s already seen its projected cost balloon from $3 billion to $16 billion.
At $400 million, Alaska’s "bridge to nowhere" was an excellent deal compared to the expense, risk, and ridiculousness of Bramble and Tilton’s nuke to nowhere.
Elliott Hansen
Salt Lake City
-
Coaching husband and wife bring success to Stansbury
Published May 22, 2013 03:29:03PM -
Holly refinery cuts pollution in updated expansion plan
Published May 22, 2013 03:27:02PM -
Prep track: State medals fuel runner Eli Oftedal’s passion to train harder
Published May 22, 2013 03:19:03PM -
Prep boys tennis: Tennis tops among Noh’s many pursuits
Published May 22, 2013 03:16:02PM
Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.






