Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Child tax deduction
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Republican state Rep. Jim Bird of West Jordan plans to introduce a bill in the Legislature to give more of the taxes from the sale of alcohol to the schools ("Utah lawmaker: Let's use booze profit for schools," Tribune, Jan. 10).

Liquor sales taxes already support school lunch programs. It makes no sense to pour even more liquor sales tax revenues into schools at the expense of every other tax-dependent program.

Putting liquor sales monies into schools is also not a logical funding stream. Monies from liquor sales should be directed only to liquor-related programs: substance abuse education, prevention and treatment; criminal investigation; DUI monitoring; prosecution of drug makers and dealers. That benefits the safety of us all, since so much of crime is related to substance abuse.

Lastly, Bird is not addressing the cause of the need for more school funding. Parents who chose to supersize their families place burdens on our already overcrowded schools and yet they receive tax deductions for each child.

If Bird wants to provide increased funding for our schools, eliminate the child tax deduction, and set aside that money for education.

Camille Pierce

Holladay

Article Tools

 Print Friendly
 
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.