Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Privacy for Petraeus
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2012, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

In "Petraeus makes bed" (Forum, Nov. 25), Eric Johnson argues that because Gen. David Petraeus withheld knowledge of his affair from his wife, family and the CIA, the resulting scandal amounts to more than "just sex." Is Johnson suggesting that one's employer is entitled to all information about an individual, including his or her private life?

Was Petraeus morally obligated to disclose details of his sex life with his wife? If not, what does his sex life have to do with his job performance? (Johnson did not allude to the possibility that the affair may have implicated national security).

Incredibly, Johnson likens having an extramarital affair to selling national secrets. Not selling secrets was an actual and relevant requirement for heading the CIA; whom one has sex with was likely not.

Johnson closes by stating that our government leaders must be held to the "highest standards." To whose standards is he referring? Johnson is free to adopt any ideas of morality, but he should recognize that they are just that — his.

For some of us, competently and faithfully performing the jobs with which our governmental leaders are charged is a sufficiently high standard.

Brian Jones

Spanish Fork

Article Tools

 Print Friendly
 
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.