Bishop endorsement

Published September 5, 2012 7:55 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2012, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Re "Rob Bishop: Insider can have clout in Capital" (Our View, Sept. 2):

Despite its reservations regarding Rep. Rob Bishop's views on the environment, the Wasatch canyons and our natural resources, The Tribune editorial board endorsed Rep. Rob Bishop for re-election in the 1st District, based on his seniority in the U.S. House of Representatives.

I guess protecting Hill Air Force Base and Thiokol outweighs protecting our natural resources, wilderness and water supply. The only natural resources Bishop is willing to protect are oil, gas and coal. Is his presence on the Natural Resources Committee a good thing for Utah?

If Bishop is too important to lose because of his 10-year tenure, then he will never be less important in 2012, 2014, 2016 and beyond.

The editorial praises Bishop's opponent Donna McAleer for her progressive views and past experiences, but the board thinks a rookie is too big a deficit. With that kind of thinking, we can never expect to see new blood from Utah.

Bill Adams


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus