Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Campaign spending
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2012, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

I've enjoyed The Tribune's articles, op-eds and editorials about the corrosive effects of unlimited campaign contributions. However, the suggested remedy of amending the Constitution would be very hard to enact ("Campaign money: Part 1: Amend Constitution," Our View, April 20).

The founders set a very high bar to pass an amendment. First, two-thirds of the U.S. Senate and House must vote in favor of it. After that, three-fourths of the state legislatures or special state conventions must approve it. (Imagine trying to do that in this hyper-partisan time.)

In the past 40 years, the Constitution has only been amended once. The 27th Amendment is fairly limited; it only prohibits changes to salaries for members of Congress from taking effect until after an election.

Keep up the fine reporting, Trib. All of us need to keep searching for a solution to runaway campaign spending.

Jim Schnitter

Salt Lake City,

Article Tools

 Print Friendly