Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Vote yes on 'D'
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2010, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

If you care one whit about ethical governance, and want state lawmakers to be held accountable when they break the rules, vote for Utah Constitutional Amendment D on Nov. 2.

The amendment would establish an independent Legislative Ethics Commission which would function like a grand jury, taking testimony and conducting investigations in order to screen ethics complaints against sitting lawmakers.

The commission would consist of staff, a budget to hire investigators and a five-member board armed with subpoena powers and composed of former lawmakers and retired judges.

If four of five commissioners would determine a complaint has merit, it would be forwarded to either the House or Senate ethics committee for trial. Lawmakers can be censured or expelled if found to have committed a violation of the legislative code of conduct or a crime of moral turpitude.

The amendment vote marks the first, and perhaps the last, opportunity for Utahns to break the good-old-boy network that too often allows legislators to go unpunished. Under the current system, which allows only lawmakers to lodge complaints against lawmakers, few complaints are filed, and legislators are rarely tried and disciplined.

The proposal isn't perfect.

For example, if complaints are upheld by the commission, lawmakers will still be tried and disciplined by their peers, as required by the state constitution. Allowing lawmakers to be tried by an impartial body would be another amendment worth seeking.

Also, to prevent smearing lawmakers with unfounded charges, the commission will conduct its business in the dark. Hearings will be closed, testimony will be delivered behind closed doors and the public will only learn of an alleged ethics violation if the complaint is upheld by the commission and referred to the Legislature for disposition. It seems that in an attempt to shield individual lawmakers from false charges, the Legislature is risking the reputation of the entire body by not allowing citizens to judge if the process works.

Worse, the Legislature wrote the rules for selecting commission members, operating the commission and handling complaints. It's a little like allowing the fox to write the rules for the hen house.

Still, the amendment beats the status quo. In fact, it even has the support of Utahns for Ethical Government, a citizens' group that tried but failed to place a wide-ranging ethics initiative on the ballot. If you are for ethical government, you should support the amendment, too.

Break good-old-boy network
Article Tools

 Print Friendly
 
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.