Shurtleff wants to split his case from Swallow’s
Embattled former Attorney General Mark Shurtleff wants to put distance between himself and his chosen successor, John Swallow.
In a motion filed Thursday, the state’s former top prosecutor asked 3rd District Judge Elizabeth Hruby-Mills to sever his criminal case from Swallow’s and argued that the two, listed as co-defendants, should never have been linked.
His attorney, Rick Van Wagoner, accused Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill of perpetuating a "myth" that the two former Republican officeholders were equally culpable in the alleged crimes with which they have been charged for the sake of misleading the media and prejudicing the public against them.
"[Gill] has prejudiced Mr. Shurtleff with his relentless media campaign and the endless reports conjoining Mr. Shurtleff’s name with allegations that are exclusive to Mr. Swallow and painting Mr. Shurtleff with the same prejudicial broad brush, thereby misleading the public and potential jury pool into believing both men must be responsible for the alleged motives and conduct of the other as part of some grand conspiracy," Van Wagoner wrote. "The cases are not and were never joined for any purpose."
Gill, who said his office would file a motion opposing Shurtleff’s request, declined to respond directly to Van Wagoner’s accusations.
"I’m sure there are going to be many motions and many different rulings in this case," the Democratic district attorney said Thursday. "We’re not going to discuss every single one. We’ll respond in normal course by filing a motion with the court."
Swallow’s attorney, Stephen McCaughey, said his client would not fight Shurtleff’s push to split the cases. It’s something, he said, that he had expected to come up sooner or later.
"They’re separate cases that should have been filed as separate cases," McCaughey said. "Whether it’s now or eventually, the cases will have to be separated."
The ties between the two former attorneys general are well known:
Swallow was Shurtleff’s top deputy and anointed successor. The men have been widely accused of accepting gifts from and associating with some of the same questionable characters. They were arrested, booked into and released from jail on July 15. In their first appearance in court July 30, the men appeared side by side as co-defendants.
Shurtleff and Swallow face a combined 23 counts, 21 of them felonies, in the most sweeping political scandal in Utah history. In convicted, each could be sentenced to up to 30 years in prison.
But this only tells part of the story, according to Thursday’s motion.
Van Wagoner claims his client is demonstrably less entrenched in the alleged crimes than Swallow, who was forced from office in December amid the ballooning scandal and multiple investigations.
"Mr. Shurtleff is charged with 10 counts and Mr. Swallow 13. Mr. Shurtleff is charged with felonies. Mr. Swallow is charged with felonies and misdemeanors," Van Wagoner wrote. "The state does not appear to allege that a single count in the respective [charges] arises from the ‘same act or conduct or ... same criminal episode.’ "
That one or both of the defendants would want to break off his case from the other is not surprising — experts widely anticipated a move like this, though most didn’t expect such a motion to come until after a preliminary hearing, at which prosecutors would have to persuade a judge to order the men to stand trial.
Shurtleff’s concern over keeping the cases attached largely hinges on ensuring his constitutionally protected right to a fair trial with an "untainted" jury pool.