Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Michele and Martin MacNeill
Martin MacNeill asks for sex abuse conviction to be dismissed
Courts » A jury found Martin MacNeill guilty of forcible sexual abuse in July.
First Published Aug 07 2014 07:33 am • Last Updated Aug 07 2014 04:01 pm

Provo • Attorneys for Martin MacNeill again are asking a judge to dismiss a sexual abuse case against him.

In early July, a jury found MacNeill guilty of second-degree felony forcible sexual abuse, finding that he inappropriately touched his adult daughter. A different Utah County jury convicted MacNeill last year of murdering his wife by drugging her and drowning her in a bathtub at their Pleasant Grove home.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

On Monday, MacNeill’s attorney, Randall Spencer, filed a motion to dismiss the sexual abuse case against the former doctor, arguing that he was unable to effectively cross-exam victim Alexis Somers because police inadvertently lost her recorded police interview from 2007.

The sexual abuse occurred May 23, 2007, about five weeks after the death of MacNeill’s wife, 50-year-old Michele MacNeill.

Somers testified at trial that after she woke at the home to find Martin MacNeill rubbing her buttocks, and licking and kissing one of her hands, the man said: "Oh, oh, I’m sorry, I’m sorry. I thought you were your mother."

Before the July trial, Spencer filed a similar motion to dismiss, asking for the case to be tossed because of loss of evidence. But Judge Samuel McVey denied the motion, saying that while there was some negligence in deleting Somers’ interview, it was not "gross negligence" and it was not done in "bad faith."

Spencer argued in the motion filed Monday that without the recorded interview, MacNeill was denied the opportunity to cross-exam Somers about inconsistent statements "with her own words" rather than the words in the detective’s case file.

"The Utah County Attorney’s Office, whether intentional or negligent, seems to have made an extraordinary number of errors in its zeal to prosecute MacNeill that has deprived him of fundamental fairness and due process," Spencer wrote in the motion, adding that he believed prosecutors in the murder case also "failed to disclose a significant amount of critical evidence."

MacNeill is scheduled to be sentenced in the sex abuse case on Aug. 25. He has not yet been sentenced in the murder case, either.

The motion filed in court this week is similar to another motion filed in MacNeill’s murder case, where Spencer asked for murder and obstruction of justice charges to be dismissed or that he be granted a new trial.

story continues below
story continues below

Fourth District Judge Derek Pullan is still mulling over the motion and is expected to have a ruling in several weeks. A sentencing date for the murder case will then be set, if Pullan does not grant a new trial.

Spencer argued in the motion that MacNeill should get a new trial because a federal inmate lied on the stand about a possible early release he received in exchange for his testimony and that prosecutors did not disclose that a deal was in the works.

Prosecutors chalked up claims of a "secret deal" to a "conspiracy theory," and said no such deal had been planned.

The federal inmate testified during MacNeill’s four-week trial that the defendant confessed to him that he drugged his wife, then drowned her in a bathtub at their Pleasant Grove home April 11, 2007.

Prosecutors said MacNeill killed his wife so he could continue an affair with another woman, Gypsy Willis.


Twitter: @jm_miller

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.