Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Judge sets hearing in clash over Tribune-Deseret News deal
Media » He will decide whether reworked business pact can be challenged.
First Published Jul 21 2014 06:06 pm • Last Updated Jul 21 2014 08:15 pm

A federal judge will hear arguments in September on whether supporters of The Salt Lake Tribune have a legal basis for suing to halt a revised business arrangement between Utah’s two largest newspapers.

On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups set a Sept. 8 hearing in the high-profile case to address, in part, whether a group of former Tribune employees has standing to challenge the amended operating agreement between The Tribune and its rival, the LDS Church-owned Deseret News.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The News’ managers and The Tribune’s corporate owner, Digital First Media, signed their current joint-operating agreement (JOA) in October. The deal cut in half The Tribune’s share of profits from the two dailies, gave the News control of joint operations and sold off The Tribune’s stake in a West Valley City printing plant.

The group of former Tribune employees and community members, Citizens for Two Voices, alleges the agreement has fatally weakened the paper’s finances and given the News too much control, creating a potential for irreparable harm to Utah if the state’s largest secular daily goes out of business.

Digital First executives deny that claim, asserting instead that the JOA changes were part of a strategy to expand revenues from digital publishing and strengthen The Tribune’s competitive position for the future.

The Sept. 8 hearing in Salt Lake City also will see attorneys argue whether the Newspaper Preservation Act insulates the News and Digital First from having the JOA challenged in court, Waddoups said.

In a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, lawyers for the News and Digital First contend Citizens does not have the legal authority to sue over the new JOA, which they say is exempt from outside scrutiny as a private business matter allowed under the federal act.

Lawyers for Citizens, also called the Utah Newspaper Project, counter that their legal challenge is authorized because the JOA has been so radically changed, it no longer deserves special protections from antitrust laws. Their suit, they say, is filed on behalf of readers, advertisers and community members fearful of losing The Tribune’s independent journalistic voice.

tsemerad@sltrib.com


story continues below
story continues below

Twitter: @Tony_Semerad



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.