Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Francisco Kjolseth | Tribune file photo) Skiers and snowboarders ride the Payday lift at Park City Mountain Resort. The resort was sold to Vail Thursday and will open this season.
Parkites sweating it out: Will PCMR open for ski season?
Ruling » A district judge orders mediation and warns of eviction if a deal isn’t struck.
First Published Jun 20 2014 04:03 pm • Last Updated Jun 22 2014 05:20 pm

It’s more torturous than waiting for the first snow of the ski season.

A defining court ruling this week in the ongoing land-lease dispute between Park City Mountain Resort and Talisker Land Holdings has done nothing to relieve the anxiety in Utah’s premier ski town.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The ski season may be five months away, but if PCMR were not to open, it would be devastating for Park City businesses, residents and taxpayers.

"It’s crystal clear to everyone with a business. The longer this goes on without a resolution the uncertainty just gets worse and worse for the rest of us," said City Councilwoman Liza Simpson, who also works at Dolly’s Bookstore.

The municipality calculated it would lose $4.1 million in taxes in the upcoming ski season if the resort were not to open, Simpson said. But that doesn’t take into consideration the impact on restaurants, lodges, ski shops and others, she noted.

"Part of what is feeding the uncertainty," Simpson said, "is that the longer people are in a fight, the less willing they are to compromise."

Third District Judge Ryan Harris ruled Thursday that PCMR failed to renew its lease in a timely fashion on 2,800 acres of ski terrain from Talisker, which has retained Vail Resorts Inc. to operate the nearby Canyons Resort. Vail has taken the lead in the legal dispute and has made no secret of its desire to operate PCMR, which is owned by Powdr Corp.

But Powdr Corp. owns the base facilities and the land under them, making operation of the resort impossible for Vail. John Cumming, CEO of Powdr Corp., has said he wants to continue to operate PCMR.

Ryan ordered the two sides into mediation and scheduled an Aug. 27 hearing to consider evicting Powdr Corp. if no settlement agreement is reached.

Most Parkites are keeping their fingers crossed in hopes that an agreement will be struck in the 2-year-old dispute. At this point, many don’t care who the operator is, as long as the resort continues to operate.

story continues below
story continues below

"It’s hard to predict what’s going to happen," said Jack Walzer, general manager of Jan’s Mountain Outfitters. "But you have to have faith because there’s too much at stake."

Jan’s has several shops in and around Park City, including one at the base of PCMR.

"If for some reason October rolls around and they haven’t reached a resolution, we’d survive because we have other shops," he said. "But there are a lot of restaurants and ski shops up there [at PCMR] that would be affected."

Parkites are weary of the controversy, according to Mike Lindbloom of the Main Street Deli.

"I don’t know anybody who’s happy about it," he said. "One person told me, ‘Just because of them, now we have to rearrange our lives.’ "

It’s clear that Powdr Corp. made a "big mistake, a horrible mistake," he said, but now they have to move forward.

"They need each other, Lindbloom said of Powdr Corp. and Vail. "They have to work it out — there is a lot of money involved."

Even though the greater Park City area has three resorts, including Deer Valley, publicity surrounding the uncertainty at PCMR could impact tourism and the economy throughout west Summit County, said Park City resident Rick Heil, who skis at both PCMR and Canyons Resort.

The dispute "has people concerned. PCMR, Deer Valley and Canyons are big draws," Heil said. "Anything that is in fact disruptive or even appears disruptive can’t be helpful."

Like Lindbloom, Heil sees Powdr Corp. holding the short end of the stick.

"PCMR has dragged this out for two years. What’s changed?" he said. "There is nothing that requires them to work together."

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.