Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Utah couple win against company that charged for bad online review
Courts » The retailer said that a ‘non-disparagement clause’ was violated.
First Published May 15 2014 05:44 pm • Last Updated May 20 2014 01:46 pm

The tables have turned for an online gadget retailer that tried to force a Layton couple to pay it $3,500 for a negative review the wife posted about the company.

A federal judge has ruled John and Jen Palmer owe nothing to KlearGear and that instead, the company owes them money. The amount is to be determined at a court hearing in June.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

In a lawsuit filed in December in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City, the couple said John Palmer never received a desk toy and a key chain he ordered for his wife in 2008. KlearGear canceled the order after an email correspondence, and Jen Palmer shared her dissatisfaction with the company’s service in a review on RipoffReport.com.

KlearGear told the couple in May 2012 that they had 72 hours to remove the post or pay it $3,500 for violating a "non-disparagement clause" in its terms of use for customers, according to the suit. The Palmers refused on the grounds, among others, that the clause was not present at the time of purchase and the terms violate the First Amendment.

KlearGear notified credit bureaus of the alleged debt, the Palmers said, which led to a poor credit rating that delayed a car loan and made it impossible for them to get a loan for a broken furnace last fall.

U.S. District Judge Dee Benson entered a default judgment on April 30 in favor of the couple after KlearGear, which appears to be based in Michigan, failed to respond to the suit. His order says the retailer is liable to the Palmers for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, intentional interference with prospective contractual relations and violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.


Twitter: @PamelaMansonSLC

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.