Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Endangered Species decision on Gunnison sage grouse delayed
Wildlife » Fish and Wildlife Service says it will use the extra time to consider public comments.
First Published May 06 2014 04:58 pm • Last Updated May 07 2014 09:49 pm

A decision on whether or not the Gunnison sage grouse of southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado should be protected under the federal Endangered Species Act will be delayed for six months, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials announced Tuesday

The deadline extension, granted by the D.C. District Court, brought immediate criticism.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"The Gunnison sage grouse needed protection 14 years ago, not another six-month delay — and certainly not a delay with the sole purpose of watering down protections," Amy Atwood, endangered species legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a prepared release.

"It’s well past time for Fish and Wildlife’s foot-dragging to end," her statement continued. "If the Gunnison sage grouse is to have any chance at survival, it needs firm protections immediately."

The Fish and Wildlife Service said the new deadline will give it time to consider information received during the public review process.

The Center for Biological Diversity and Western Watersheds Project claim the federal agency is "bowing to political pressure from oil and gas and other industries."

The Fish and Wildlife Service estimates there is a population of 4,621 Gunnison sage grouse, which are recognized as separate species from the greater sage grouse. The vast majority of Gunnison sage grouse are located in Colorado.

The greater sage grouse is on a list of candidate species for Endangered Species Act protection. Found throughout Utah, its listing would have a far greater impact, and the Bureau of Land Management has released a proposed plan to safeguard it without that level of protection.


Twitter: @BrettPrettyman

story continues below

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.