Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
((Courtesy photo) ) Danielle Willard, 21, was shot and killed Nov. 2, 2012, by West Valley City Police detectives during a drug investigation at an apartment complex.
Utah Supreme Court sides with DA on one point in Danielle Willard case

He’ll get transcript of denied request for grand jury; no word on whether he can appeal denial.

First Published Apr 17 2014 03:27 pm • Last Updated Apr 19 2014 07:51 pm

In a case that appears connected to the Danielle Willard shooting, the Utah Supreme Court on Thursday said the Salt Lake County District Attorney should be given the transcript of its request to convene a grand jury.

But the Supreme Court delayed any decision on the underlying matter — whether the district attorney can appeal the judges’ decision not to impanel a grand jury.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Instead, the Supreme Court asked district attorney Sim Gill and the judicial branch’s own lawyers for more briefs on that matter, and whether the case can even be argued in public.

City Weekly reported in January that Gill’s office sought a grand jury to consider whether criminal charges can be filed against West Valley City police officers Shaun Cowley and Kevin Salmon. But a panel of five state court judges that hears requests to convene such grand juries refused the request, according to court records.

Salmon and Cowley shot and killed Willard on Nov. 2, 2012, as they were investigating what they thought was a drug deal. Gill has already said the shooting was not justified under Utah law, though representatives of Salmon and Cowley argue they were defending themselves. Willard was backing a car out of parking spot and struck Cowley.

Grand jury proceedings are typically regarded as secret unless an indictment is issued. Gill’s office complained it couldn’t even receive a transcript of what happened before the panel of judges.

Thursday’s ruling agreed that the district attorney needs a transcript in order to make an informed argument for overturning the panel’s denial for a grand jury.

Neither Thursday’s written ruling nor oral arguments held before the Utah Supreme Court on April 1 mentioned Willard’s name, though the oral arguments mentioned the name of the prosecutor assigned to the Willard case, and Gill has previously acknowledged legal issues were delaying a decision about filing charges against Salmon and Cowley.

The Supreme Court ordered all sides to submit briefs by May 19.

ncarlisle@sltrib.com


story continues below
story continues below

Twitter: @natecarlisle



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.