Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Steve Defa of Escalante inspects oil that accummulated in Little Valley Wash, Saturday, March 29, 2014. BLM officials attribute the spill to a slow pipeline Upper Valley oil field, operated by Citation Oil and Gas Corp. They believe leaving the oil in the wash may be the best option for protecting the desert ecosystems of the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.
BLM studying how to contain Grand Staircase oil damage
Grand Staircase » Oil flowed into wash from a recent slow leak, not a 40-year-old spill.
First Published Apr 09 2014 03:25 pm • Last Updated Apr 10 2014 07:40 am

A "pinhole" leak that went undetected for weeks, possibly months, is responsible for the oil now matting a desert wash in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, according to officials probing the spill discovered last month.

Bureau of Land Management officials are figuring out how to monitor and contain the mess, but they say leaving the oil in place will likely pose the least threat to the fragile desert ecosystems at the headwaters of the Escalante River.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The Upper Valley oil field, developed in the 1960s and ’70s, sits on a remote mesa along the monument’s northern edge, west of Escalante, the tiny historic ranching town that gives this scenic region its name.

The field’s aging network of 3-inch gathering lines has been implicated in at least three serious petroleum releases in as many years, most recently the spill in Little Valley Wash first reported by hikers three weeks ago.

The field’s operator, Houston-based Citation Oil and Gas Corp., failed to report these spills as required under the permit and operating plan that allow it to extract oil and gas from public lands.

But federal officials believe there may be extenuating circumstances and say the company has cooperated fully in efforts to determine the causes and address the environmental damage.

Acting monument supervisor Sarah Schlanger says the Little Valley release could have been so gradual that it failed to trigger Citation’s leak-detection equipment, which monitors pressure changes inside pipelines. The company discovered the leak and patched the pipe sometime last winter, but the oil had moved down the wash so the extent of the spill was not immediately obvious.

Citation’s operating plan required the company to report leaks greater than 10 gallons, but it may not have known it exceeded the threshold because the rugged terrain below was still covered in snow, BLM officials said.

Schlanger has since ordered the company to report all future leaks, regardless of size, within 24 hours of their discovery. The U.S. Forest Service has also instructed the company to beef up its reporting, after leaks associated with Upper Valley wells on the Dixie National Forest lands adjacent to the monument.

Citation regional supervisor Mark Bing did not respond to email and voice-mail messages Wednesday.

story continues below
story continues below

The latest spill came from a pipe moving hot liquids from Citation’s Well No. 27, which yields only 17 barrels of oil a day, plus another 400 barrels of saline water.

The pipeline, which runs under a road to the well, leaked from a spot about 200 yards up-gradient from the well. The escaped water-oil mix dropped down a steep gully and the oil accumulated in the wash, leaving a tarry carpet up to six inches deep stretching 1.5 miles downstream.

The spill has fueled environmentalists’ arguments that the BLM should not allow oil and gas development near parks and other sensitive areas and must apply stricter standards to existing development.

It has also caught the attention of Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, who noted that it is difficult for the BLM to know what happens on every section of the 245 million acres it administers.

"It’s a good illustration that these are vast landscapes," Jewell said. "We rely on operators doing a good job and reporting issues when they occur, and there’s probably some lessons to be learned on this one."

Upon receiving photos of the spill, the BLM dispatched teams of petroleum engineers, geologists and biologists to the site.

Their reports deflated initial speculation that the oil had spilled decades ago.

However, there is anecdotal evidence that the field discharged oil in several areas back in the 1970s, long before the monument’s 1996 designation, when environmental standards were far more lax. Back then, crews simply mixed oil with dirt, and vestiges of those spills may still be apparent, said monument spokesman Larry Crutchfield.

But the stuff clogging the wash is no more than a few years old and monument officials are determining what kind of threat it poses to plants, wildlife and water. The BLM is also examining neighboring drainages for oil contamination.

"We have crews doing assessment of the chemical composition of the oil, looking for saline indicators in the soil that would go along with spills and collecting soil samples," Schlanger said. "That helps us get a handle on the relative age of any spills and get a handle on the sequence of events and potential of the oil to harm any resources out there."

The salt in the water produced by the well would have been expected to damage plants along the wash, but so far there is little evidence that the plants — such as yellow fir needles — are suffering or that salinity has built up in the soils.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.