Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Alta ask court to toss snowboarders’ lawsuit

First Published Mar 24 2014 11:10 pm • Last Updated Mar 24 2014 11:16 pm

Alta ski resort has asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by snowboarders seeking access to the mountain, arguing that the snowboarders’ claim of a rights violation "demeans the Constitution itself."

The snow sports advocacy group Wasatch Equality in January joined four boarders in suing Alta, claiming its no-snowboards policy is the result of hostile attitudes toward snowboarders and violates boarders’ constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"It demeans the Constitution to suggest that the amendment that protected the interests of former slaves during Reconstruction and James Meredith and the Little Rock Nine must be expanded to protect the interests of those who engage in a particularized winter sport," Alta’s attorney’s wrote in Friday’s brief. "There is no authority holding that the zone of interest created by the Fourteenth Amendment protects those who stand sideways on snowboards."

They also argued that Alta is a private resort operating on federal land, so its rules don’t amount to state action.

"The permit and the plan [approved by the U.S. Forest Service] are utterly silent on Alta’s business decision regarding the use of snowboards," Alta’s attorneys wrote. "The decision about permissible equipment at Alta was made by Alta, not the Forest Service."

Even if the snowboarding ban were a government policy, Alta argued, it is not a result of animus but rather of business motives. Alta points to claims in the snowboarders’ complaint that the snowboarding ban conforms to Alta’s attempt to cater to a skier-only market and "maintain a skiing culture." Alta’s attorneys also argue that snowboarders have a "blind spot" due to traveling sideways down the mountain, which poses safety concerns.

The ban also keeps snowboarders off Alta’s "long, high mountain traverses, which are difficult on a snowboard," attorneys wrote. "It is not irrational for state actors to determine that some winter sports equipment is more suitable than others on certain terrain."

Alta’s attorneys did not address whether snowboarders actually are subject to hostility from the resort or its patrons, but they argued that snowboarders are not marginalized by unpopularity.

"Those who snowboard can hardly claim they represent the kind of politically unpopular community that the Constitution was designed to protect," attorneys wrote.

Snowboarders Rick Alden, Drew Hicken, Richard Varga and snowboarding pro Bjorn Leines filed the lawsuit Jan. 15.

story continues below
story continues below

On Jan. 12, a group of snowboarders, including Alden, Hicken and Varga, bought tickets at Alta and tried to ride the Collins lift with their boards; instead ski patrol escorted them away, the lawsuit claims. When Alden got onto a lift using a split board — a snowboard that separates down the middle for cross-country travel and reattaches for downhill travel — patrollers intercepted him at the top of the lift.

Meanwhile, an array of ski equipment was allowed, including one mono-ski.

The lawsuit noted that three resorts in North America ban snowboarding: Alta, Deer Valley and Mad River Glen in Vermont. But only Alta is on public lands.

The ban "excludes snowboarders from use and enjoyment of the public land on which Alta operates," the lawsuit claimed.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.