Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Senate panel OKs bill requiring big families to pay more for schools
Senate » Sponsor estimates measure, approved by a panel, would mean extra $267M for schools.
First Published Feb 10 2014 07:39 pm • Last Updated Feb 21 2014 06:56 pm

Large Utah families might soon have to pay more of what some say is their fair share toward schools if a bill that gained early approval Monday becomes law.

SB118 would limit families to two state personal income-tax exemptions, which workers can claim for themselves and their dependents. Now, families may get the exemptions for each child — a situation that has left some Utahns complaining over the years that those with the most children end up paying the least into the school system, which is largely funded through income-tax revenue.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The Senate Education Committee approved the bill 4-2 on Monday, despite criticisms from some that it would mean a tax increase for families.

But bill sponsor Sen. Pat Jones, D-Holladay, said allowing so many deductions has eroded support for Utah schools. Now, some families get so many deductions that they actually end up paying no income tax at all, Jones said.

"In Utah, the way we pay for public education is backward," Jones said. "Under our current system, the more a family takes advantage of public education, the less a family pays … those that use the public-education system most should share responsibility for paying for it."

She estimated the bill would mean another $267 million for Utah schools each year. That’s nearly $100 million more than all the new state money put toward education in Utah for this school year.

Decisions on how to spend the money would be made locally and focus on schools’ improvement plans. Jones said elementary schools could get about an additional $300,000 per year, middle schools about $400,000 and high schools $700,000.

She said it would likely cost a family of three about $143 additionally each year.

Laura Pinnock, a mother of four who testified in favor of the bill, said the money could, for one, be used to reduce class sizes.

"My kids are not getting the education that this state should be providing," Pinnock said of the current funding situation. Utah has the lowest per-pupil spending in the nation.

story continues below
story continues below

Others, however, worried about the tax increase it would mean for many families. Royce Van Tassell, vice president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, said it would be one of the largest tax increases the state ever faced.

"I think one of the challenges you inevitably face when funding public education is there is a hope and maybe an expectation that increasing student spending will translate into better outcomes for the students," Van Tassell said. "Intuitively, that makes sense but there’s very little evidence to support that."

This is the first time a committee of the Legislature has supported the bill, Jones said.

SB118 was actually one of two funding bills the committee decided to advance Monday.

The committee also voted in favor of SB111, which seeks to help even out funding for school districts across the state. It would do that by freezing a state property tax rate — known as the minimum basic tax rate — allowing more money to be collected as property values rise. Now, that rate decreases as values rise.

The additional money collected would then be distributed to schools.

Bill sponsor Sen. Aaron Osmond, R-South Jordan, estimated that about $12 million could be collected the first year, and as much as $100 million within five years. The fund could be capped at $100 million, Osmond said, giving lawmakers a chance to decide whether to continue the program at that point.

School community councils would decide how to spend the money within certain parameters.

The overall idea would be to help equalize funding for schools across the state. Now, some districts have relatively low property tax rates but collect a lot of money because they are in wealthy areas, whereas others have relatively high rates but collect little money because they’re in poorer areas.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.