Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Swallow probe not worth the price, Utahns say
Poll » They also want to see the attorney general job remain an elected post despite Swallow controversy.
First Published Jan 16 2014 01:01 am • Last Updated Mar 12 2014 11:53 am

After months of work, investigators hired by the Utah House to get to the bottom of the John Swallow scandal found evidence destruction and fabrication, a pay-to-play culture, an elaborate network created to hide campaign donors and likely violations of election laws.

But Utahns appear to choke on the probe’s price tag — now projected to top $3.5 million — according to a new poll for The Salt Lake Tribune.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"As far as I’m concerned about doing an investigation, it’s just a waste of taxpayer money," said Salt Lake City resident Jim Forsgren, who participated in the survey. "I don’t know why the taxpayers have to back up everything that happens politically."

Forsgren is not alone in his sentiment. Nearly half the Utahns in the poll (48 percent) say the Swallow investigation was not worth the expense. More than a third (35 percent) say it was.

While there was some discussion last month about whether the House investigation should continue — despite Swallow’s resignation, Utahns overwhelmingly oppose the idea by better than a 2-to-1 margin.

By a comparable 34-point margin, Utahns dislike a proposal to change the method for choosing Utah’s attorney general, from the current elected post to a one appointed by the governor.

Rep. Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, chairman of the House Special Investigative Committee, said he feels stronger now that the investigation was important than he did when lawmakers created the bipartisan panel last summer.

"I wish it didn’t cost what it cost, but it was a very involved investigation with a lot of tentacles, some misdirection, and I think it was worthwhile and important that we do it," Dunnigan said. "I would just invite people, if they haven’t listened, to listen to a little more of our presentation [of the findings] and everybody will have to make their own decisions."

Poll respondent Gordon McGavin, of Holladay, said the accusations warranted an investigation and that Swallow was right to step down.

"If there are allegations of wrongdoing, they should be investigated and appropriate action taken," McGavin said. "There were too many clouds over his head and he was spending all his time worrying about that. He couldn’t perform his functions properly. It probably would’ve been better if he’d [resigned] sooner."


story continues below
story continues below

House Majority Leader Brad Dee, R-Ogden, a member of the investigative committee, said lawmakers had an obligation to get to the bottom of the scandal engulfing the Republican attorney general.

"It was necessarily spent to restore the citizens of Utah’s faith in the fact that, if there’s a problem in government, we’re going to fix it," Dee said. "I think, in this particular case, the record has shown that there was indeed a problem and we have indeed addressed that."

Another committee member, Rep. Rebecca Chavez-Houck, D-Salt Lake City, said the public’s opinion might be different if Swallow were still in office. When the panel was established, she said, Utahns’ desire was clear.

"We were responding," she said, "to what we were hearing our constituents say at the time, which is: Get to the truth of the matter."

Chavez-Houck hopes the investigative work shed light on "challenges" in the state’s campaign-finance laws and that legislation will result to solve those issues.

The Tribune poll found that, by a large margin — 59 percent to 27 percent — Utahns oppose the House investigation continuing now that Swallow has left office, and Dunnigan said he doesn’t expect much more to be done.

He said the investigators and attorneys hired by the committee are putting together their report, and there might be some additional work done to tie up loose ends. That report may not be released to the public until the end of February.

Dunnigan has said the probe’s cost wouldn’t have been as steep if the committee hadn’t been forced to spend money trying to recover Swallow’s deleted electronic records and litigating over numerous subpoenas. He has said those two factors tacked on more than $1 million to the price tag.

The Tribune’s survey was part of an automated poll of 600 Utahns conducted by SurveyUSA from Jan. 10-13. The sample included home and cellular phones with margins of error for these questions ranging from 4 percentage points to 4.1 percentage points.

Democrats in the survey believe the investigation was worthwhile by a margin of 45 percent to 39 percent, while Republicans say it wasn’t by a spread of 58 percent to 31 percent. Independents broke against the probe’s price, as well, 44 percent to 35 percent. These subsets, it should be noted, have much larger margins of error.

One proposed change in the aftermath of the Swallow saga is a proposed amendment to the Utah Constitution to alter how attorneys general are chosen.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.