Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Appeals court sets aside Internet neutrality rules
Ruling » Judges say FCC set up legal contradiction for broadband providers.
First Published Jan 14 2014 06:25 pm • Last Updated Jan 14 2014 09:31 pm

Washington • In a decision that could reshape consumers’ access to entertainment, news and other online content, a federal appeals court Tuesday set aside Federal Communications Commission rules designed to ensure that transmission of all Internet content be treated equally.

The anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules have barred broadband providers from prioritizing some types of Internet traffic over others.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

A three-judge panel said that the FCC has the authority to regulate broadband providers’ treatment of Internet traffic. But the judges concluded that the FCC failed to establish that its regulations don’t overreach.

"Even though the commission has general authority to regulate in this arena, it may not impose requirements" that violate statutory mandates, wrote appeals judge David Tatel. The judges said the FCC’s rule in effect treated all Internet service providers as common carriers — transporters of people or goods for the general public on regular routes at set rates. Examples of common carriers include airlines, railroads, trucking companies and utilities.

But the court said the commission itself already had classified broadband providers as exempt from treatment as common carriers, which set up a legal contradiction.

The FCC failed to establish that its regulations do not impose common-carrier obligations on the Internet companies, the judges ruled in a setback for the Obama administration’s goal of Internet openness.

The decision empowers leading Internet providers to decide which Internet services — such as Netflix movies, YouTube videos, news stories and more — they would allow to be transmitted to consumers over their networks.

In some cases, Internet providers such as Verizon, AT&T and cable companies can demand that Google, for example, pay them to ensure that YouTube videos are accessible to all their consumers, or Google could pay extra to ensure that YouTube videos are delivered faster.

The court said it was aware of concerns expressed by supporters of the FCC policy about what might happen if the rules were overturned.

"For example, a broadband provider like Comcast might limit its end-user subscribers’ ability to access the New York Times website if it wanted to spike traffic to its own news website, or it might degrade the quality of the connection to a search website like Bing if a competitor like Google paid for prioritized access," the court said.

story continues below
story continues below

Verizon, which filed the case against the FCC, said the decision "will not change consumers’ ability to access and use the Internet as they do now. Verizon has been and remains committed to the open Internet."

Advocacy groups such as Public Knowledge called the ruling a disappointing loss for Internet users because the court found that the open Internet rules were built on a flawed legal foundation.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the commission will now consider its options, including an appeal, to ensure that networks on which the Internet depends provide a free and open platform.

Some experts questioned whether any immediate change will emerge from the ruling.

The FCC chairman has signaled his view that this affirms the commission’s ability to go case by case, calling problems as they see them," said Jonathan Zittrain, former chairman of the FCC’s open Internet advisory committee. He said it was telling that stock prices on most affected companies "haven’t budged" in light of the decision.

Verizon and Google long ago published their own Net neutrality deal that can provide a framework for others in the industry.

"That might explain why you don’t see anybody gloating or the market moving," Zittrain said.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.