Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Teen battling cancer awaits Utah Medicaid expansion
Health reform » Cancer patient can’t get treatment as state edges to rejecting a full benefit expansion.
First Published Jan 15 2014 11:56 am • Last Updated Jan 16 2014 02:50 pm

Within months of graduating from high school, landing an auto collision repair job and moving into his own apartment, Joshua Kahn was diagnosed with cancer.

Hodgkin’s lymphoma is highly treatable and the chemotherapy started last fall was going well for the St. George teen.

At a glance

Utah-style Medicaid expansion

A legislative task force has endorse three alternatives to a full Medicaid expansion:

» Do nothing and keep Medicaid eligibility rules as they are now.

» Use public dollars to buy private insurance for residents with incomes under the federal poverty level. Those earning at least the poverty level or up to 138 percent of that amount would shop with federal subsidies on the federal health exchange, www.HealthCare.gov.

» Use public dollars to buy private insurance for the full expansion population, those earning up to 138 percent of poverty.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

But on Dec. 1, Kahn turned 19 and was cut from Medicaid, putting a halt to his treatment. In Utah, adults who don’t have children — no matter how poor — don’t qualify for the low-income health program unless they are disabled.

Kahn’s mother, Julia Buckner, said her son’s situation highlights the injustice of Utah’s dithering over an optional expansion of Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act.

Kahn is among 123,000 uninsured Utahns who would be covered if Utah determined eligibility solely on income, as envisioned by the health law. Instead, Kahn’s access to care hinges on his age, ability to work and whether he has a wife and kids.

"I thought that cancer was our biggest battle until I tried getting health care coverage for our son," she said.

The hospital has arranged a payment plan to allow Kahn to finish his first round of chemo. But without insurance he’s unable to get a PET scan to determine whether he needs further treatment or radiation.

"I have this [chemo] port sitting under my skin that I can’t get removed," he said. "The biggest thing that scares me is the cancer could go backwards and get worse."

Appeals to the state, including written notes from Kahn’s doctor who says he’s unfit to work while undergoing chemo, weren’t enough to convince officials to reinstate his coverage, Julia Buckner said.

Under federal rules, cancer patients generally aren’t deemed disabled unless their disease is severe enough to prevent gainful activity for a prolonged period of time.

story continues below
story continues below

"Evidence in your file indicates that you are unable to work at this time. However, your condition is expected to improve and should not prevent you from returning to work for a full 12-month period," said a Nov. 13 denial of Kahn’s disability claim with the state Department of Workforce Services.

Kahn’s rosy prognosis, however, hinges on treatment, Buckner said of the Catch-22 her son faces.

"The caseworker actually suggested having him reapply based on him not being in treatment because without treatment his cancer is terminal," she said.

Kahn can’t get on his mother’s insurance because she is disabled due to a spinal cord injury and on Medicaid.

He could buy private coverage on the new federal health exchange, healthcare.gov — but he falls into another health care gap.

Because his income is below the federal poverty level, he doesn’t qualify for federal tax credits. He is too poor, in other words, to get subsidized health coverage — a gap that exists only in non-expansion states.

"This isn’t just a gap, it’s a gorge," Buckner said. "This is bigger than Josh and my family. I’m sure there are other families in this situation."

If Kahn lived in neighboring Arizona, a red state and one of 26 states to have already accepted federal dollars to expand their Medicaid programs, he would be covered.

Utah lawmakers worry about future state costs but are edging closer to a compromise, a conservative alternative to a full expansion. Republican Gov. Gary Herbert has stayed on the sidelines but has said he’ll weigh in during the Legislative session starting Jan. 27.

And the White House is ready to make a deal.

"We’ll be flexible with any state that wants to lean forward and cover more of its people," said David Simas, a special assistant to the president.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.