Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Plan for controversial Kanab energy plant goes belly up
Energy » Company dumps experimental project after feds yank $2.4 million grant.
First Published Sep 20 2013 09:36 am • Last Updated Feb 14 2014 11:34 pm

The company developing a coal-gasification plant that divided Kanab residents is pulling the plug after failing to meet the terms of its federal grant to demonstrate a new energy-production technology.

California-based Viresco Energy, LLC, had won a $2.4 million Department of Energy grant in 2010, thanks to a congressional earmark secured by then-Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The goal was to prove gasification processes developed by engineers at the University of California, Riverside. But many residents fought the project, fearing it would put an industrial eyesore inside city limits, spewing pollution from a 70-foot stack that would mar Kanab’s redrock vistas.

Viresco principal Jim Guthrie and his supporters, however, said these concerns were overblown.

Still, one group is suing Kanab, seeking to overturn the conditional-use permit it issued, and had backed an unsuccessful ballot measure that would have required voter approval for any gasification project inside the town.

"There were tremendous financial risks associated with it," said critic Sky Chaney, president of Taxpayers Association of Kane County. "Guthrie wanted to put waste into our water treatment system. He said the liquid waste would be like distilled water, but his experts later said it could be dangerous and would be shipped away in barrels."

But, in the end, it probably wasn’t environmental activism that doomed the project, which would have provided temporary employment to seven, but rather a lack of interest from investors.

Now Guthrie is seeking to back out of his lease with the state School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration and to reclaim the 10-acre site, located a few miles south of downtown near the new Jackson Flat Reservoir.

Guthrie chose Kanab because Utah’s regulatory climate was more friendly to new energy projects than California’s. But now he claims foot-dragging on the part of Kanab officials to issue necessary permits held up the project.

"We kept telling the city that time is money. Then Bob Bennett wasn’t able to stay in office," Guthrie said.


story continues below
story continues below

The city approved the conditional-use permit more than two years ago, but had not issued a building permit because Viresco had failed to file a plan to meet the decommissioning requirements, according to town documents. The city insisted on getting a bond to ensure compliance with a requirement to take down the stack, which exceeded the town’s height restrictions.

Other than clearing brush and putting in a gravel base, not much work had been done at the site, according to SITLA officials.

Far more effort went into producing a 490-page environmental assessment, which concluded the project posed no significant impact.

Guthrie’s plan was to process small amounts of coal, about five tons a day for brief stretches, to determine the commercial feasibility of a patented process that taps steam to convert various carbon-based materials into useful fuels. The project was highlighted in Gov. Gary Herbert’s 2011 energy plan.

Under the terms of the DOE grant, the $2.4 million was to cover 80 percent of the project’s costs, and Viresco was to raise the remaining $600,000.

Darryl Shockley, the official at DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory overseeing the Viresco grant, forwarded queries to an agency spokeswoman, who would say only that Viresco failed to meet its obligations, so the grant was terminated. DOE officials did not respond to repeated requests for elaboration.

bmaffly@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.