Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts

Trib Talk: What is Utah’s “ag-gag” law and is it constitutional?
First Published Jul 31 2013 08:19 am • Last Updated Jul 31 2013 08:02 pm

In Utah, it’s currently a crime to take photos or video of livestock or poultry on private property without the owner’s consent, but a group of animal rights activists is challenging the law in federal court.

The two sides debated the issue Wednesday on TribTalk.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The group of activists, represented by civil rights attorney Stewart Gollan, claim the law violates individual’s First and 14th Amendment rights by stifling one side of the agricultural debate, involving in part the treatment of animals.

"People need to know how the products they buy are treated," Gollan said, noting that the law has already had a "chilling effect" on investigative journalism in the state.

"It simply criminalizes if you take a photograph or video," he said. "It doesn’t do anything if you trespass and don’t take a photo or video."

He said the lawsuit is asking that the law be deemed unconstitutional.

Sterling Brown, with Utah’s Farm Bureau, said the law is necessary to protect the security of farms and ranches and to protect the safety of the public who might come onto the farms and ranches.

"The existing trespass laws were not adequate," Brown said. "We still had abuse. We still had security breaches. We still had issues concerning to our food and fiber."

He said the law is necessary to protect food supplies from those that would like "hamper or reduce" that type of security.

In addition, Brown noted that video and pictures can be manipulated to make things look worse than they are.


story continues below
story continues below

"History has proven it happens, and it makes the industry look bad," he said.

But Gollan noted that the state’s "ag gag" law could prove to be a slippery slope because it could span similar law protecting other industries — such as daycares — that would like to regulate potential criticism.

"Every industry would like special protections," he said.

The state of Utah has 60 days to file its response to the lawsuit.

jstecklein@sltrib.com

Twitter @sltribjanelle



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.