Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Anthony Michael Watkins
Utah Supreme Court overturns Uintah County man’s sex abuse conviction
Courts » Uintah County man was found guilty in 2009.
First Published May 10 2013 07:02 pm • Last Updated Dec 07 2013 11:31 pm

A Uintah County man serving prison time for molesting a child will get another chance to beat the rap after the Utah Supreme Court overturned his conviction Friday.

In a 12-page decision, the court vacated the conviction of Anthony Watkins, 44, whom a jury found guilty of aggravated sexual abuse of a child in 2009. The decision states that prosecutors did not adequately prove that Watkins’ case warranted "aggravated" status.

Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Watkins’ attorney Jamie Pluene said that adding the word "aggravated" to the charge elevates its severity and leads to a more severe penalty. The decision means that Watkins case goes back to the district court in Vernal for another hearing.

Watkins is serving 10 years to life in prison.

Pleune praised the decision Friday and anticipated that Watkins would also be pleased. Pleune added that Watkins had argued he was innocent of the charge he faced and that the Supreme Court decision supports that assertion.

Assistant Attorney General Jeanne Inouye said Friday that she was disappointed by the decision. She added that the justices opted for an interpretation of Utah law that differs from the one used by the Utah Court of Appeals.

Watkins’ case began in September 2008 when he temporarily moved into a family’s spare bedroom. While living with the family, the children, whom he watched at least once, were told to call him "Uncle Tony."

According to court documents, the victim said that in October, Watkins kissed her and was "kind of pinching [her] butt." He later reportedly paid the girl $100 "and told [her] not to tell anybody," court documents add.

At the end of Watkins’ trial in July 2009, his attorneys asked the judge to dismiss the case, arguing that prosecutors never proved Watkins committed "aggravated" sexual abuse of a child. The judge rejected the request, but the Supreme Court later took up the issue.

The Supreme Court decision focuses on the issue of "undue influence." In order to include the word "aggravated" in a sexual-abuse charge, prosecutors must prove a defendant was both in a position of authority and could exercise undue influence over the victim.


story continues below
story continues below

Utah law includes a list of "positions of authority." The list includes things like schoolteachers, scout leaders and doctors. It also includes an "adult cohabitant of a parent," which prosecutors argued applied to Watkins. The justices didn’t contest the idea that Watkins met that description and therefore had a position of authority.

Instead, the court said that being in a position of authority doesn’t automatically result in the ability to exercise undue influence. The Supreme Court decision will change the way prosecutors approach cases, requiring them to prove defendants had both authority and undue influence.

In Watkins’ case, the decision means prosecutors only did half of what they needed to obtain a conviction.

"Because the lower courts did not require the state to establish both elements, we vacate Mr. Watkins’ conviction and remand for further proceedings," the decision states.

Neither Pluene nor Inouye knew exactly what would come next beyond a hearing in Uintah County.

jdalrymple@sltrib.com

Twitter: @jimmycdii



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.