Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Cody Augustine, 23, listens as his attorney, Randy Richards pleads his case in front of Judge Judith Atherton, in 3rd District court, Friday, April 22, 2011. Augustine was sentenced to three years to life in prison for stabbing a teenager with a knife while his friend attacked the same boy with a battle ax 2 1/2 years ago.
Utah Juggalo loses attempted murder appeal in battle ax case
Crime » Court rejects Augustine’s appeal for a new trial due to extreme emotional distress during attack.
First Published Mar 07 2013 01:02 pm • Last Updated Mar 11 2013 02:27 pm

A man who attacked his girlfriend’s ex-lover with a knife, while his friend used a battle ax, has lost his latest effort to escape an attempted murder conviction.

In a ruling released Thursday, the Utah Court of Appeals affirmed Cody Jesse Augustine’s conviction on one count of attempted murder, a first-degree felony. Augustine, 25, was convicted two years ago for repeatedly stabbing 17-year-old Justin Ennis with a knife outside Ennis’ Kearns home in 2008.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Augustine’s friend, Scott Tyler Stapley, also participated in the attack and reportedly wielded a four-sided battle ax. Augustine used a knife, police reported. Both Stapley and Augustine were sentenced to three years to life in prison.

Police have said Stapley and Augustine were members of the Juggalos, fans of the Insane Clown Posse rap group who are classified as a gang by the FBI and Utah law enforcement.

Augustine’s attorneys argued he should get a new trial because he was under extreme emotional distress during the attack. They contend they should have been allowed to call an expert witness to testify at trial about Augustine’s emotional state. The trial judge prevented the expert from testifying, and defense attorneys appealed, saying that violated Augustine’s constitutional right to call witnesses.

According to the appeals court ruling, Augustine’s emotional-distress defense was based on three "triggering events": He reportedly believed he had contracted a sexually transmitted disease from his girlfriend, who he concluded must have been infected by Ennis; he drove to Ennis’ home for a fistfight, which "spiked his adrenaline"; and he suffered emotional distress at the sight of blood as he and Stapley attacked Ennis.

Prosecutors have described the incident as being like a "Hollywood slasher flick." Ennis suffered an 8-inch cut to his neck, a 10½-inch cut in his left pectoral muscle and smaller cuts on his shoulder and hands. It required more than 300 stitches to close his 12 wounds, five of which were from being stabbed, and he spent five days in the hospital.

Together, those triggers caused Augustine to "lose control of his rationality," his attorneys argued.

The appeals court rejected that argument, ruling that Augustine was not allowed to make an extreme emotional distress defense. That defense is invalid because the "stressors" causing Augustine’s emotional state were "self-created."

The ruling consequently sides with government attorneys who argued that Augustine’s emotional distress was the result of engaging in a violent attack. They also pointed out that emotional distress cannot be used as a defense if it is caused by the commission of a crime.

story continues below
story continues below

Assistant Utah Attorney General Karen Klucznik said Thursday afternoon that she was "very pleased" with the ruling. During the trial, she said, the judge assumed the emotional distress argument would apply but said Augustine’s witness wouldn’t have helped the jury.

But the appeals court sidestepped that issue by ruling the argument didn’t apply in the first place, Klucznik said.

Augustine’s attorney did not immediately return calls seeking comment Thursday afternoon.


Twitter: @jimmycdii

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.