Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | Tribune file photo) Rep. Roger Barrus, R-Centerville, front, votes on a bill on the Utah House floor.
Bill dealing with fluoridation causing some waves
Health » Davis lawmaker gets bill through House but Senate proving more difficult.
First Published Feb 21 2013 11:23 am • Last Updated Feb 21 2013 02:04 pm

Rep. Roger Barrus, R-Centerville, wants to ensure that Utah communities with fluoridated water know precisely what’s in the water.

At a glance

Fluoridation

Fluoridation of water systems is more than half a century old on the national level with Grand Rapids, Mich., standing as the first city to do so. In Utah, the following jurisdictions have fluoridated water, according to the state:

Davis County

Salt Lake County

Brigham City

Helper

Hill Air Force Base

The Ute Tribal System

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Barrus, sponsor of HB72, believes if a fluoridation system is in place, it should have appropriate safety measures and full disclosure of water quality throughout the process, until it reaches the consumers’ tap.

Many fluoridation products are transferred in bulk via tanker trucks, rail cars or other means, which some believe could potentially degrade water quality.

"We need to inform our public of exactly what they’re consuming," said Barrus, a retired engineer and a lawmaker since 2000. "The request for it came from informed constituents to ensure compliance with scientific and legal standards already established."

Davis County Attorney Troy Rawlings is backing the proposed legislation.

In a letter to Barrus, Rawlings said the bill is straightforward and unrelated to previous controversy in the county about fluoridation.

"Despite representations you may hear from other voices, this has nothing to do with the merits of the fluoride debate," Rawlings’ letter said. "The request is based on researched and reasoned inquiries from informed constituents. It has everything to do with (a) ensuring that the additives do not deter water quality/safety and (b) compliance with scientific and legal standards set up to accomplish this."

Barrus said HB72 addresses a statewide concern, and he has a hard time fathoming why the bill is facing obstacles in the Legislature.

"What rational legislator would ever tell a constituent that ‘I support putting impurities in your drinking water, but I don’t want to give you a transparent process so you can know how much?’" Barrus said in an email to The Tribune.


story continues below
story continues below

Another Davis county lawmaker, Rep. Stewart Barlow, R-Fruit Heights, agrees.

"It’s a good thing to improve local control," Barlow said. Local residents are "the ones drinking the water."

The bill, if enacted, would go into effect in July — requiring all manufacturers to supply documentation that they meet standards advocated by the private National Sanitation Foundation/American National Standards Institute certifications.

Ken Bousfield, director of the state Division of Drinking Water, worked with Barrus on the bill, but declined to comment whether it had his support. He said, however, that he has been satisfied previously in trusting his relationships with fluoridated water suppliers.

HB72 passed in the House 59-12 but has been held up in a Senate committee since Feb. 7.

Rep. Larry Wiley, D-West Valley City, was among the dozen opponents in the House. He views it as just another attempt to question fluoridation altogether.

"It’s like trying to kill a fly with a sledgehammer," Wiley said. He believes there is ample federal oversight and tracking of products containing hazardous materials.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets a maximum contaminant level for fluoride ion in water at 4 milligrams per liter. NSF-certified treatment products are limited to less than one-third of that amount of contaminant, according to the NSF.

Sen. Allen Christensen, R-Ogden, a retired pediatric dentist, is a big proponent of fluoridation and questions the purpose of the measure.

"I just want to make sure it’s not an end run to stop fluoridation," he said. "If we found out that batch certification wasn’t available, then the county has to pull the fluoridation."

Thatcher Company, Utah’s biggest chemical manufacturing and distribution company, who has been in the water treatment business for 30 years, will be left to deal with the legislation’s consequences, if enacted.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.