Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Utah Pride Center board members hold a press conference Wednesday announcing plans to file court briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court, which will rule on two cases involving gay marriage. From L to R, Steven Ha, Allen Miller, Jon Jepsen, Nikki Boyer, and Billie Gay Larson. (Man in background is Kent Frogley) Courtesy image.
Supreme Court to hear about bias against gay Utahns

LGBT» The Utah Pride Center will file court briefs as the high court prepares to hear about California’s Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

First Published Jan 30 2013 12:24 pm • Last Updated May 05 2013 11:34 pm

Pointing to incidents of discrimination toward gay people, Utah Pride Center officials announced Wednesday they will file a court brief on impending cases before the U.S. Supreme Court involving gay marriage: California’s Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

One of the cases, from California, could establish or reject a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Another case, from New York, challenges a federal law that requires the federal government to deny benefits to gay and lesbian couples married in states that allow such unions.

At a glance

— Being fired in Utah for being gay

As the Utah Pride Center announced Wednesday that it will enter the U.S. Supreme Court’s debate on marriage equality, another civil rights advocacy group, Equality Utah, will hold a forum Wednesday night to discuss discrimination against LGBT Utahns. Equality Utah said there are up to five complaints filed every month by gay and transgender Utahns who have been fired, simply for being, or being perceived as, gay or transgender. These citizens have no recourse because Utah doesn’t currently protect people from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. There is no statewide nondiscrimination policy, although some cities have enacted them.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

There are nine states that offer same-sex marriage including Washington D.C.

"There’s a system of discrimination that impacts LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) people who live in Utah," Paul Burke, an attorney representing Utah Pride said during a news conference Wednesday where the court participation was announced.

Burke cited four events in Utah as examples of discrimination against the LGBT community. He said the first occurred on Jan. 30, 1996, when the Utah Senate met behind closed doors to prevent teens from forming gay-straight alliance clubs in public high schools. Lawmakers later enacted school club laws that raised obstacles to starting such clubs in schools.

Prohibiting same-sex couples from adopting children and denying marriage "equality" are other examples of discrimination, Burke said.

In 2004, Utah voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The Beehive State, like many other states at the time, already had a law defining marriage as only between a man and a woman, but Amendment 3 specifically does not recognize same-sex marriages, even if they are performed in a state where they are legal. Amendment supporters at the time said the issue would be on firmer legal ground if it were embedded in the Utah Constitution.

Bill Duncan, director of the Utah-based Marriage Law Foundation, said Wednesday his group has also submitted what’s called an "amicus" brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, but for the opposing side, arguing marriage is defined as a man and a woman.

Duncan said dozens of amicus briefs will likely be filed from both sides on the gay-marriage cases.

"[An amicus brief] is a written submission giving arguments for why [the Supreme Court] should rule one way or another," Duncan said. "We’re just trying to bring things that are important to the court’s attention."


story continues below
story continues below

Legal experts have said the Supreme Court has wide latitude in both cases, so their decisions could decide the gay-marriage issue for the nation or leave it up to each state.

The court’s rulings will come amid a rapid shift in public attitudes about same-sex marriage, with recent polls indicating that a majority of Americans support allowing such unions. And in November, voters in three states — Maine, Maryland and Washington — approved same-sex marriage, marking the first time the issue was approved by voters instead of the result of legislative or court action.

Many Utahns not only have a philosophical connection to California’s Prop 8, they have a financial interest.

The California law passed with 52 percent of the state’s vote, saying marriage is a man and a woman, but it was overturned in 2010 by a federal judge, and then the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. The Salt Lake City-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints spent $189,004 on the "Yes on 8" campaign, while businesses and individuals from Utah contributed $3.8 million to the campaign, more than 70 percent of it in support of Prop 8.

Allen Miller, a Utah Pride board member, said the center’s Wednesday announcement that it will dive into the Supreme Court debate holds special meaning for him. He said although he always knew he was gay, he remained married to his wife and raised a family in the Mormon church for more than 30 years.

But in the end, he divorced his wife and left the church.

"We all deserve equality," Miller said.

Burke and Brett Tolman, who is also representing the center in court, said Utah has a special place in the gay-marriage debate because of what they termed as "heightened discrimination" against LGBT citizens.

"We are at a crossroads in our history," said Tolman, a former U.S. Attorney for Utah who is now in private practice. "Legal equality should be in the reach of every individual."

Valerie Larabee, executive director of the center, said: "Utahns’ voice in the fight for marriage equality has been long, distinguished and visible."

The Supreme Court will hear the two gay-marriage cases on March 25 and 26, and if it follows tradition, the court will release its decisions the last week of June.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.