Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | The Salt Lake Tribune) Aaron Bryant received a pardon from the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole but still spent eight months and $3,500 to get his criminal record wipe clean. The Utah Legislature will look at a bill to make the process clearer as well as more accessible for people with certain drug offenses. Bryant was photographed outside his place of work in Salt Lake City, Thursday, January 10, 2013.
Plan aims to help Utahns with criminal pasts start anew
Expungement » Lawmakers want to streamline the process for the people leaving behind their criminal past.
First Published Jan 22 2013 01:01 am • Last Updated May 05 2013 11:33 pm

Everywhere Beth Linker turned, a criminal past haunted her.

It came up when she sought a better job and when she tried to volunteer, despite the fact that Linker served a brief prison sentence, completed parole early, and has remained drug- and crime-free for more than 10 years.

At a glance

No expungement option

Utah law says expungement is prohibited for the following crimes or situations:

Capital felonies, first-degree felonies and violent felonies

Automobile homicide

Felony DUI alcohol/drugs

Registerable sex offenses

Crimes that are pending or being investigated

Statute of limitations has not been met

Waiting period not met

Fines, interest and restitution has not been paid

When there are two or more felony criminal episodes

Any combination of three or more convictions that include two class A misdemeanors

Any combination of four or more convictions that include three or more class B misdemeanors

Five or more misdemeanors or felony episodes

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Linker tried to get that past swept clean through Utah’s expungement process only to be told she was not eligible given the number of her felony convictions for drug-related crimes and an initial failure to complete her first probation.

That’s when Linker turned to the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, which pardoned her crimes in March. But even with that decision in hand, Linker has been unable to clear her record, stymied by a redundant, complicated and expensive process — one Utah lawmakers will look at refining in the 2013 legislative session.

Last session, lawmakers created a committee within the Utah Substance Abuse Advisory Council to study issues related to expungement of drug-related offenses. That group came up with recommendations embodied in HB33, sponsored by Rep. Eric K. Hutchings, R-Kearns.

It would allow a specified number of drug-possession felony and misdemeanor offenses to be eligible for expungement and also clarify that a pardon granted by the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole — which granted 17 pardons in 2012 — has the same legal effect and authority as a court ordered expungement.

"It is certainly a good first step in a direction towards giving opportunity where opportunity is deserved and not having to be so rigid … about who gets a break and who doesn’t," said Scott Reid, an assistant attorney general who was co-chairman of the Drug-Related Offenses Expungement Committee.

"This doesn’t reduce anybody’s sentence," said Santiago Cortez, a past chairman of the Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness and committee co-chairman. "This is for people who do the right thing. … In many cases, we’ve made thousands of dollars of investments to make these people productive citizens and then when they get to the workforce they have barriers."

A costly, complicated process » The Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification receives 700 to 800 applications each month from people seeking to expunge their criminal records. Given that volume, it takes the bureau 10 to 12 weeks to let applicants know if they are even eligible to proceed.

story continues below
story continues below

Some crimes can’t be expunged, such as capital murder, first-degree and violent felonies, and registerable sex offenses. Utah law also limits by type and number the convictions a person may have to be eligible for expungement and requires any sentence, probation, fine or restitution to have been met. In addition, the law requires a clean record following the last conviction and waiting periods of varying length, depending on the crime, before a person can seek an expungement: 10 years for any alcohol or drug-related offenses, seven years for eligible felonies, and three to five years depending on the classification of a misdemeanor offense.

The proposed bill would create a five-year waiting period for a felony drug offense.

Fees begin to pile up right from the start: There is a $50 application fee and then a charge of $56 per conviction for a certificate saying the crime is eligible to be expunged. A five-page checklist lays out the process applicants must follow; victims, prosecutors, Adult Probation and Parole and judges may all weigh in on whether or not to grant an expungement.

"It’s very expensive and it’s very difficult," Cortez said.

If a person is denied an expungement, he or she can seek forgiveness from the Board of Pardons.

"It’s the last opportunity that is available for somebody who is trying to get their record cleansed," said Jesse Gallegos, a board member who served on the Drug-Related Offenses Expungement Committee. In many cases, "They have remarkably turned their lives around and gone on to receive college degrees and are prohibited from employment in their requisite field because of their criminal records."

The bill would recognize the board’s authority to forgive a criminal past, ending what is now a duplicative expungement process and reducing expenses for those who get a pardon.

"We are not changing anything about the process and not changing anything about the crimes we are willing to look at," Gallegos said of the bill.

Pardon not enough » Although Linker, 48, received a full and unconditional pardon, she was nonetheless required to apply to the Bureau of Criminal Investigations and go through the entire expungement process, paying fees and charges at each step.

Linker said there is little uniformity between courts, and the number of forms to complete is overwhelming. Linker said she filled out one set of forms available online at the state-court website, only to be told by both a district court and a justice-court clerk that they had their own preferred forms that she would need to fill out.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.