Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Utah records panel sides with newspaper, favors release of injured teen’s name
First Published Sep 13 2012 12:14 pm • Last Updated Dec 25 2012 11:32 pm

Releasing the name of a teenage boy who was hit by a car is not an unwarranted invasion of privacy, the state Records Committee ruled Thursday.

The committee unanimously granted the Sanpete Messenger’s appeal of the Utah Highway Patrol’s decision to withhold the name of the boy, who was struck by a car on June 5 in Fountain Green.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Committee member Lex Hemphill said the state failed to make its case that releasing the boy’s name would be a "clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy."

"I don’t know what would trump the clear language of [the Government Records Access and Management Act]," Hemphill said. "I don’t think this is the one."

Dwayne Baird, Utah Department of Public Safety spokesman, said part of the reason the name was withheld was because the boy might be charged for walking on a highway at night. Baird said the fact that the boy was in a group home and under Department of Human Services jurisdiction also led the UHP to hold back the name.

Linda Petersen, national Freedom of Information chairwoman for the Society of Professional Journalists, said the public safety department was twisting GRAMA to justify withholding the boy’s name.

"It is a very dangerous thing when the law enforcers become the interpreters of the law," Petersen said, "or law enforcers become lawbreakers."

Suzanne Dean, the Sanpete Messenger’s publisher, said having the information helps the community relate to the story and sheds light on the operation of group homes.

Christian Probasco, a reporter with the weekly paper, said he was happy the committee upheld the appeal, fending off what he feared would be a bad precedent. But he said he wished the case had set a standard for openness.

Kevin Bolander, assistant Utah attorney general, said the public safety department would review the decision and could appeal to court.


story continues below
story continues below

dmeyers@sltrib.com

Twitter: @donaldwmeyers

facebook.com/donwmeyers

gplus.to/DWMeyers



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.