Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Family’s lawsuit claims police shooting of Woods Cross man unjustified
Courts » But investigation cleared officers involved.
First Published Jul 11 2012 05:36 pm • Last Updated Jul 13 2012 05:51 pm

A civil lawsuit filed Monday alleges law officers used unreasonable and excessive force when they fired on and killed an intoxicated, suicidal Woods Cross man two summers ago.

The complaint was filed by the wife and sons of William C. Oakden IV and names as defendants the cities and police departments in Woods Cross, West Bountiful and Bountiful; Davis County and its attorney’s office; and officers, investigators and detectives involved in the case. The lawsuit alleges the defendants violated several of Oakden’s constitutional rights. It seeks damages for medical and burial expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of earnings because of Oakden’s untimely death.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Oakden, 30, slit his wrists and then attempted to get help from a neighbor on July 9, 2010. Oakden banged on the side of the neighbor’s trailer home and told the man to call for help or he would put the knife through his own heart. The neighbor called 911 and told dispatchers he could see Oakden outside his window holding a knife in his hand. The neighbor came outside after making the call and found Oakden sitting on his own porch.

According to the lawsuit, the neighbor could see Oakden had a gun tucked in the waistband of his pants but couldn’t tell if it was real. When the neighbor reached for the gun, Oakden slapped his hand away. Police arrived about that time and one heard the neighbor say to Oakden, "Don’t do it."

The neighbor said he was pulled away by officers, who then ordered Oakden to raise his hands. When he did, Oakden’s shirt rose and revealed the gun tucked in his pants. Two officers ordered Oakden, who was later determined to have a blood alcohol content twice the legal limit, to keep his hands in the air but he allegedly dropped them, pulled out the gun and pointed it at the officers.

"Even though his shirt would have fallen down over the gun in his waistband as he lowered his arms, Mr. Oakden still somehow go the drop on both officers," the lawsuit states.

One officer told investigators he ordered Oakden to drop the gun. The other said he then heard the gun — later found to be an airsoft toy gun — fire and he returned fire, as did the other officer.

Accounts differ as to whether Oakden, who was struck 16 times, was sitting or standing when the officers shot him.

A review later found the two Davis County officers acted lawfully after Oakden pulled the black-handled gun from his pants and fired it at officers.

Davis County Attorney Troy Rawlings said Tuesday the lawsuit came as a "surprise," in part because Scott Cottingham, the family’s attorney, was given "unprecedented" access during the investigation of the shooting to evidence and witnesses. That was done to give the family "confidence that the investigation was proceeding and the evidence was being accumulated and vetted properly."


story continues below
story continues below

He said Cottingham also was invited, but did not take advantage of that offer, to review the decision before it was released publicly and give input on any shortcomings or errors in its findings.

Cottingham declined to comment.

"We’re absolutely confident in the decision that was made to not prosecute the police officers involved for criminal activity," Rawlings said. "The investigation was thorough, complete and fair. We believe that as we defend this civil action, all that is going to happen is our process and decision making will be exonerated and vindicated, and we look forward to it."

brooke@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.