Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
FILE - In this June 18, 2014 file photo, General Motors CEO Mary Barra testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Barra makes her second appearance before a Senate subcommittee investigating the company's handling of a defective ignition switch in small cars on Thursday, July 17, 2014. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)
Senate panel examining GM legal department
Auto safety » Senators likely to grill GM’s lawyers about mishandling of switch issue.
First Published Jul 17 2014 09:11 am • Last Updated Jul 17 2014 11:30 am

Washington • A Senate panel will pose questions to a new set of key players Thursday as it delves deeper into General Motors’ delayed recall of millions of small cars.

GM CEO Mary Barra will certainly be asked about how she’s changing a corporate culture that allowed a defect with ignition switches to remain hidden from the car-buying public for 11 years. It will be Barra’s second time testifying before the panel.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

But Senators at a hearing of the Senate Commerce subcommittee on consumer protection might sling their most pointed questions at GM General Counsel Michael Millikin as they drill down on the role the company’s legal department played in the mishandled recall.

An internal investigation led by former federal prosecutor Anton Valukas — paid for by GM — showed that even as GM lawyers recommended the settlement of similar cases involving crashes where front air bags failed to deploy in Chevrolet Cobalts and Saturn Ions, they didn’t alert higher-ups, including Millikin, to a potential safety issue.

Lawmakers may also question Valukas about the report’s conclusion that a lone engineer, Ray DeGiorgio, was able to approve the use of a switch that didn’t meet company specifications, and years later, to order a change to the switch without any senior executives at GM being aware.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a Senate subcommittee member who has criticized the Valukas findings as "the best report money can buy," says he’ll ask Valukas at the hearing "why they failed to go beyond the low-level management and engineers."

Also testifying will be Rodney O’Neal, the CEO and president of Delphi. His company manufactured the ignition switches. Compensation expert Kenneth Feinberg will testify about the plan he recently unveiled for compensating victims of crashes caused by the faulty switches.

Some other questions senators may ask:


—Q: How does GM plan to change the corporate culture exposed by Valukas’s report? In light of the revelations, was the termination of 15 employees sufficient?

story continues below
story continues below

Valukas’s investigation found a dysfunctional culture in which people didn’t take responsibility for fixing problems. Barra has said that GM has restructured its process for making safety decisions, elevating it to the company’s highest levels.

Senators also may have more questions on how much Barra knew about the problem with the ignition switches when she was GM product development chief.


—Q: What role did the company’s legal department play in the delayed recall?

GM attorneys signed settlements with families of some crash victims in cases where the switch defects figured. Blumenthal said in an interview he wants to know, "Why did GM insist on keeping the settlements secret?"


—Q: Why did Delphi send GM the switches even when its own tests showed that the force needed to turn them didn’t meet GM’s specifications?

Delphi, once a GM division, didn’t allow Valukas’s investigators to interview its employees and turned over a limited number of documents.

Senators likely will ask O’Neal whether Delphi should have notified GM higher-ups after DeGiorgio approved the out-of-spec switches. DeGiorgio also told Delphi to alter the switches in 2006 but not change the part number, making the change hard to track. That raises the question of why Delphi agreed to keep the part number the same.

Panel members will want to know when Delphi found out that the switches began causing fatal crashes, and why the company continued to provide them to GM after knowing about the deaths.


Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.