Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Matt Maddox, president of Wynn resorts, addresses the Massachusetts state gaming commission during a public hearing on the possibility of awarding one of three state approved resort casinos to the city of Everett Wednesday, June 25, 2014 in Everett, Mass. (AP Photo Stephan Savoia)
Sodexo cafeteria workers regain health coverage
Workforce » Company backtracking from original claims that Obamacare is to blame.
First Published Jun 26 2014 12:24 pm • Last Updated Jun 26 2014 12:24 pm

Washington • A giant food service company unexpectedly backtracked Thursday after bumping thousands of college cafeteria workers from its health plan and casting blame on President Barack Obama’s overhaul.

Sodexo’s experience could serve as a cautionary tale for other employers trying to pin benefit reductions on "Obamacare." The company’s original cutbacks earlier this year fueled a union organizing drive and campus protests.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Julie Peterson, Sodexo’s vice president for benefits, said the company will make changes for next year to restore eligibility for many of those affected.

"We think that overall this is going to result in about the same number of employees being eligible as in the past," Peterson said.

Among those who lost their coverage through Sodexo this year was Julie Pemberton, a cashier at Curry College, a liberal arts institution near Boston.

Pemberton puts in more than 40 hours a week during the academic year. She’s paying over $200 a month more in premiums since she switched to a plan from the Massachusetts health insurance exchange.

"I’m actually looking for a new apartment because this is just draining any savings I have," said Pemberton. "I can’t just keep paying and paying and paying."

UNITE HERE, a labor union trying to organize Sodexo workers, said the company’s cutback was facilitated by what it calls a loophole in federal regulations carrying out the health law’s requirement that larger employers offer coverage.

The Obama administration responds that the employer, not the health care law, is to blame.

French-owned Sodexo is a multinational service company with U.S. headquarters in Maryland. It operates many college cafeterias and also provides other campus services. In January, Sodexo reclassified some of its workers as part-time by averaging their hours over a 52-week calendar year. That affected about 5,000 of its 133,000 U.S. employees.


story continues below
story continues below

Sodexo said it was acting to align itself with the health care law, which requires that employers with 50 or more workers offer coverage to those averaging at least 30 hours per week, or face fines.

Company official Peterson said Thursday that for benefits purposes, the company will now credit campus employees during the summer break with the hours they would have worked during the academic year.

The UNITE HERE union says federal rules require colleges and universities to essentially do the same thing for their faculty employees. But those rules don’t apply to contractor employees in cafeterias.

"There is nothing in there that says contract workers are protected," said union spokesman Ethan Snow.

At least one college that examined the issue agreed with the cafeteria workers. Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana, recently amended its contract with Sodexo to require that the employees be offered coverage.

"Sodexo’s classification system was not consistent with the practices of other vendors, or with Earlham’s policies," said Sena Landey, vice president for finance at the Quaker-founded liberal arts institution.

Landey said it looks like a slip-up on the part of federal regulators.

"I think it has to be an oversight," Landey said. "I just don’t understand why you would benefit faculty and not those on the lower end of the pay scale. I don’t see the logic in it."

The Treasury Department, which enforces the health law’s employer coverage requirement, declined requests for an interview. Spokeswoman Erin Donar provided a statement:

"Nothing in the Affordable Care Act requires an employer to eliminate health coverage for any employees or penalizes an employer for offering health coverage to all employees. An employer that eliminates health coverage is doing so by choice, not by requirement. We are aware of concerns that have been raised regarding the treatment of employees of contractors working at educational institutions and, as always, we are considering this feedback."

The mandate that larger employers provide health coverage is one of the most complicated parts of the health care law. Lawmakers intended it mainly as a safeguard against companies shifting their traditional responsibility for health insurance to taxpayers.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.