Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
In this July 13, 2008 photo cars move near the Anheuser-Busch St. Louis brewery. August Busch III was CEO of Anheuser-Busch Companies for nearly three decades before his 2002 retirement, remaining as board chairman until 2006. The St. Louis brewer is being sued for gender discrimination by Francine Katz, who was the company’s highest ranking female executive before her 2008 resignation. Katz says she was grossly underpaid compared to her male predecessor and other top male executives at the company. (AP Photo/St. Louis Post-Dispatch, David Carson)
Anheuser-Busch trial highlights gender bias in pay
Discrimination » Anheuser-Busch trial highlights hot-button issue of gender bias in pay.
First Published May 02 2014 09:30 am • Last Updated May 02 2014 03:19 pm

St. Louis • From male-only corporate jets to guys’ golf outings and hunting trips, Francine Katz says her time in the Anheuser-Busch executive suite was rife with exclusion, intentional slights and outright discrimination. But it wasn’t until the King of Beers’ 2008 sale to Belgian brewer InBev in a hostile takeover that she says she realized the boy’s club atmosphere was costing her millions in salary and bonuses.

In a 20-year career that saw her rise from a young corporate lawyer to a job as vice president, key strategist and the beer maker’s top female executive, Katz became the public face of her hometown employer, defending the maker of Budweiser and Bud Light from overzealous regulators and anti-alcohol crusaders before Congress and on network TV news shows.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Now she’s accusing Anheuser-Busch of sex discrimination, arguing in a 2009 lawsuit that went to trial this week that top male executives — including former CEOs August Busch III and his son, August Busch IV — purposely paid her less solely because she’s a woman. Six years after the sale of AB to inBev, the trial fascinates a company town, threatening to give more unwanted publicity to a family dynasty that’s had its fair share.

"This was a company run by men who were unaccustomed with working with women at high levels," Katz’s attorney, Mary Anne Sedey, told the jury of seven women and five men in opening arguments of a trial expected to last several weeks.

The trial comes amid growing national attention to gender discrimination in the workplace. In March, the White House Council on Economic Advisers issued a report noting that on average full-time working women earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by their male counterparts. Critics of the report said that figure oversimplifies the situation, but even they concede that women with advanced degrees in fields such as medicine and law face a persistent wage gap as their careers advance.

Counting bonuses and stock options, Katz earned more than $1 million annually after her 2002 promotion to vice president of communications and consumer affairs and elevation to the company’s influential strategy committee. Her predecessor, former National Urban League President John Jacob, earned four times that amount in his final year, Katz’s lawyer said. Katz said she didn’t realize the pay gap until reviewing tax filings connected to the sale to InBev.

Katz said August Busch III called her "ungrateful" after she brought her complaint about the salary disparity to him and other top company executives.

"Make no mistake about it. Francine Katz earned a lot of money at Anheuser-Busch," Sedey said. "But like so many women in this country, Francine Katz was significantly underpaid."

Her attorney said Katz deserves at least $9.4 million she was entitled to from 2002 to 2008, plus punitive damages. In 2008, her final year with the company, Katz reported more than $14 million in income on her federal tax returns, an amount that includes stock options she cashed in.

Lawyers for Anheuser-Busch counter that Katz’s salary, benefits and bonuses compared favorably to those in similar positions at Coca-Cola, Proctor & Gamble and other large U.S. corporations. They suggested that her primary duty involved public relations, while Jacob had far more substantive responsibilities, including as August Busch III’s trusted confidant.


story continues below
story continues below

"Francine Katz was paid based on her job, not her gender," said Anheuser-Busch attorney Jim Bennett. "There was a fair process used, a rigorous process used."

Liz Watson, a senior counsel at the National Women’s Law Center who specializes in employment law, said the jury should not focus just on her admittedly sizable salary.

"Pay discrimination in any job is simply illegal and intolerable, no matter the level of compensation," she said.

Both August Busch III and his son and namesake, who led the company for two years before its sale, are expected to testify. Their presence is sure to draw close attention in St. Louis, where a bevy of buildings, from university lecture halls to the St. Louis Cardinals’ stadium, bear the family name.

The elder Busch, 76, succeeded his father as CEO in 1975 at 38 in a coup initially resisted by August "Gussie" Busch Jr. August Busch III remained in charge for nearly three decades before his 2002 retirement and stayed on as chairman of its board of directors through 2006. Under his watch, the family business founded by German immigrants in 1876 became the country’s largest brewer.

Katz testified that Busch and another company executive forced her to fly on a separate corporate plane when the group traveled to Columbus, Ohio, so Katz could meet with the state’s attorney general while her boss convened with Ohio’s governor. On other occasions, she was excluded from corporate golf tournaments and other social functions, she said.

"I felt invisible," Katz said.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.