Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman points to a reporter during a news conference at the NTSB in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery that caught fire earlier this month in Boston shows evidence of short-circuiting and a chemical reaction known as "thermal runaway," in which an increase in temperature causes progressively hotter temperatures, federal accident investigators said. -It's not clear to investigators which came first, the short-circuiting or the thermal runaway, Hersman said. Nor is it clear yet what caused either of them, she said. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
NTSB chief: Boeing design should have prevented 787 battery fires
Safety» Groundings indefinite as regulators seek cause of ‘unprecedented’ event.
First Published Jan 24 2013 07:11 pm • Last Updated May 05 2013 11:33 pm

It looks like Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner fleet, grounded worldwide for the past week, will stay grounded for some time because of "unprecedented" safety breaches.

National Transportation Safety Board chair Deborah Hersman said Thursday the agency has reached no conclusion so far on the cause of the fire aboard a 787 in Boston on Jan. 7.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

But Hersman made clear the severity of the incident as she addressed the grounding of the Dreamliners, while adding that the battery issues that prompted the grounding should have been prevented by the aircraft’s design.

"This is an unprecedented event. We are very concerned," she told reporters at a news conference at the agency’s Washington D.C. offices. "We do not expect to see fire events on an airplane. This is a very serious air safety event."

Despite multiple redundant safety features built into the system by Boeing, "those systems did not work as intended," Hersman said. "We need to understand why."

An NTSB team has disassembled and scanned the battery that caught fire. Investigators determined that internal short circuits had caused heating inside some of the battery cells. They found that the battery had suffered what’s called a "thermal runaway," an uncontrolled overheating that spreads from cell to cell.

But they have not yet established the sequence of those events or whether either is the cause, or a symptom of what went wrong. Neither has the NTSB determined for sure whether the battery over-charged or if there could be internal manufacturing defects.

Boeing, which manufactures some parts for the Dreamliner at its operations in Salt Lake City, on Thursday said it "has formed teams consisting of hundreds of engineering and technical experts who are working around the clock with the sole focus of resolving the issue and returning the 787 fleet to flight status."

Tests ahead include a battery drawdown that will take a week. Hersman didn’t have an answer for how long the investigation might take to come to a conclusion on the cause of the fire.

The Federal Aviation Administration, not the NTSB, must determine if the 787 will remain grounded. But given the lack of progress and the dire warning about how serious this event was, the FAA may not be in a position to lift the grounding any time soon.


story continues below
story continues below

The current Boeing 787 crisis began Jan. 7 when a small battery fire broke out aboard an empty Japan Airlines that half an hour earlier had landed at Boston’s Logan International after a 12 hour flight from Tokyo.

All 183 passengers and 11 crew members had left the airplane when a mechanic making routine maintenance checks detected smoke in the cabin.

Airport firefighters found a battery fire in the rear electronics bay, in the lower fuselage just behind the wing. The jet was almost new, delivered to Japan Airlines only in December.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.