Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File) A federal appeals court has ruled that Texas law governs foreclosures in Utah when carried out by a unit of Bank of America. But in doing so it left open a big door for further legal challenges to that position.
BofA settling key lawsuit over Utah foreclosure
Law » An earlier decision in case had called into question the legality of bank’s practices.
First Published Dec 18 2012 07:33 am • Last Updated Apr 08 2013 11:33 pm

Bank of America has agreed to a substantial settlement in a lawsuit by Utah homeowners in which an earlier ruling had raised serious questions about whether a unit of the bank had legally foreclosed on homes in Utah.

But the state of Utah, which intervened in the case and filed its own complaint, has not signed off on the settlement and apparently wants to continue to assert its claim that the bank’s ReconTrust Co. unit, based in Texas, illegally carried out foreclosures in this state.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Homeowners Timothy and Jennifer Bell had sued Bank of America arguing that Countrywide Financial, which BofA acquired in 2008, had engaged in predatory lending practices when it provided them a loan to refinance their Holladay home under terms they did not qualify for and could not afford. They asserted that ReconTrust illegally began foreclosure proceedings on their property when they went into default.

Now, BofA has agreed to reduce the original loan of about $3 million by $1.1 million to make the new loan amount equal to the present value of the property, according to a motion and memo filed Monday in their lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City.

The couple’s interest rate also was reduced from the original 7.5 percent to a below-market rate of 2.65 percent for 26 years, court documents say.

"My clients chose to settle because they believe the loan modification benefits they received are … fair and just, and they want to move on with their lives," said Abe Bates, the Bells’ attorney.

Attorneys for BofA did not return an email seeking comment.

U.S. District Judge Bruce Jenkins still has to approve the settlement before it becomes final.

Under Utah law, only local attorneys or title companies are allowed to foreclose on property in the state. ReconTrust, however, used neither in the Bells’ case or hundreds of other foreclosures in the aftermath of the real estate market’s free fall that began in late 2007. The company argued in court that it is governed by Texas law given that it carries out the foreclosure operations from its headquarters there.

But Jenkins ruled that national laws require banks to obey state statutes in the places where they operate, not the laws of the state in which they have their main offices.


story continues below
story continues below

That ruling was at odds with those of two other federal judges in Utah on questions that probably will be settled by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Utah Attorney General’s Office did not respond to an email seeking comment on the settlement in the Bell case.

Another case with some of the same issues is set for oral arguments before the 10th Circuit on Jan. 14. The state of Utah has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in that case but has been denied permission to participate in the oral arguments before a panel of judges.

If the panel upholds the lower court ruling in favor of ReconTrust, the Attorney General’s Office wrote, "No doubt … ReconTrust will re-enter the state without any accountability to the citizens of the state, and the Utah Attorney General will be powerless to enforce Utah’s trustee qualification statute against ReconTrust — or any other national bank in the country for that matter."

tharvey@sltrib.com

Twitter: @TomHarveySltrib



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.