Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Rick Egan | Tribune file photo) Packages roll through the shipping plant at Salt Lake City-based Overstock.com.
Utah onboard (again) with online sales tax movement
Commerce » States want the revenue, but opponents pan the effort as a tax increase.
First Published Jun 08 2012 06:41 pm • Last Updated Sep 11 2012 11:33 pm

Utah is moving to become a full voting member in the multistate organization pushing to let states begin collecting billions of dollars in sales taxes they say they are owed on online purchases.

The Beehive State was key in helping launch the movement in 2000, but then took a big step back in 2006 over a provision that would have required changing the way sales tax rates around the state were calculated.

At a glance

Utah and online taxes

Utah will assume a leading role in the Streamlined Sales Tax movement this year.

State Rep. Wayne Harper, R-West Jordan, is set to ascend to the presidency of the governing board of the multi-state organization at the group’s annual meeting Sept. 18-20 in Salt Lake City.

State officials expect Utah’s petition for full membership will be effective beginning Oct. 1.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

In a special meeting this week, the Utah Tax Commission voted unanimously to petition the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board for full membership. The main benefit, according to Commission Chairman Bruce Johnson, will be voting rights.

However, there’s also a chance the state could see a slight increase in revenue from online retailers who voluntarily collect sales tax from customers.

Currently, Utah receives about $4 million annually from those businesses, Johnson said, "it might go up a little bit."

Proponents of remote-sales taxation cite a study that estimate potential revenues of around $11 billion nationwide — including some $88 million to Utah.

Former Gov. Mike Leavitt was a big proponent of an online tax strategy, pointing to the hit to state budgets as commerce increasingly goes digital. He also argued it as a matter of fairness — that retailers with physical stores were required to collect sales tax while court rulings allowed online vendors to go tax free.

Opponents counter that states shouldn’t expect out-of-state retailers to function as their tax collectors and that those retailers don’t use any of the state services that benefit in-state businesses. Under a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, states cannot force companies with no physical presence in the state to collect taxes.

"What we do oppose," said Jonathan Johnson, president of Utah-based Overstock.com, "is states trying to get remote sellers to collect sales tax for them in an unconstitutional way."

Most states, like Utah, have laws on the books requiring residents to report and pay the sales tax for online purchases — but few comply.


story continues below
story continues below

Therefore, says Johnson, while not technically a tax increase, collection of such levies "is going to feel like a new tax to people who have shopped on the Internet."

He said Overstock and others would support Congress passing an e-commerce tax law so long as it required states, among other things, to compensate companies for the time and expense of collecting taxes and to pay for and provide the necessary collection software.

Critics also point to the complicated overlay of thousands of taxing jurisdictions and rates nationwide.

Part of the goal of the streamlined sales tax effort is to simply the administration of collecting e-commerce taxes by having the participating states adopt uniform definitions of what is taxable and how rates are calculated.

Utah in 2006 balked at a requirement of the multi-state organization that all taxes be calculated based on where goods were delivered, rather than on point of sale.

The change can make a big difference. Sales tax rates vary in Utah from a high of 8 percent in Panguitch to a low of 5.75 in Fillmore.

But last month the organization amended its requirements to open the door to full membership to states like Utah that base in-state sales tax on point of sale, but use point of delivery to calculate remote sales taxes.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.