Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
R. Allen Stanford, center, leaves the Bob Casey Federal Courthouse, Tuesday, March 6, 2012, in Houston. Stanford, once considered one of the wealthiest people in the U.S., with a financial empire that spanned the Americas, was convicted Tuesday on charges he bilked investors out of more than $7 billion. (AP Photo/Houston Chronicle, Nick de la Torre)
Investors: Stanford verdict won’t restore $7B loss
Courts » Stanford “sentenced them to a life of hardship and poverty,” retiree says.
First Published Mar 10 2012 01:01 am • Last Updated Mar 10 2012 01:01 am

Houston • Investors taken in by Texas tycoon R. Allen Stanford expressed relief and a sense of vindication after a federal jury last week convicted the jet-setting financier of swindling them out of more than $7 billion. But they said the verdict will never replace the loss of their life savings.

"He sentenced them to a life of hardship and poverty, and they have no chance to ever recover from what has happened to them," British retiree Kate Freeman said from her home in Antigua. She lost $820,000 in Stanford’s Ponzi scheme. "I don’t think [the verdict] will make a lot of difference with regard to victims seeing any money any sooner."

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Two days after the verdict, a Texas jury cleared the way for U.S. authorities to go after $330 million in stolen investor funds sitting in frozen foreign bank accounts controlled by Stanford.

The jury, which convicted the former tycoon on 13 of 14 fraud-related counts earlier this week, found there to be sufficient evidence that the money in 29 accounts in Switzerland, Britain and Canada was some of the more than $7 billion he stole from investors over a period of 20 years. He was acquitted on a single count of wire fraud that accused him of bribing a regulator with Super Bowl tickets.

Even so, Angela Shaw, who founded the Stanford Victims Coalition after she and her husband lost $2 million in the scheme, called the verdict "bittersweet."

"Of course we wanted him to be convicted," she said. "In an ideal world, that would mean we would get some of our money back. But it doesn’t work that way."

The recovery process has been complicated by conflicts between authorities in securing Stanford’s assets, which are scattered across several countries. While Stanford once had a net worth estimated at more than $2 billion, he received court-appointed attorneys after his assets were seized or frozen.

Prosecutors say Stanford used investors’ money to fund a string of failed businesses, bribe regulators and pay for luxuries such as yachts and private jets. His attorneys portrayed Stanford as a visionary entrepreneur who made money for investors and conducted legitimate business deals.

The most serious charges against Stanford carry up to 20 years in prison, and if he is ordered to serve his sentences consecutively, the 61-year-old could spend the rest of his life behind bars. In a similar but unrelated case, disgraced financier Bernard Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison for orchestrating the largest Ponzi scheme in history.

U.S. District Judge David Hittner will likely set Stanford’s sentencing date after the civil trial, which started after the verdict Tuesday and could last as little as a full day.

story continues below
story continues below

Prosecutors and Stanford’s family declined to comment.

Stanford did not testify in his own defense.

Three other former Stanford executives are scheduled for trial in September.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.