Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Courtesy photo) Raser Technologies' Thermo 1 plant near Beaver turned out to be more costly and produced much less electricity than the company envisioned. Raser contends in a lawsuit that the Thermo 1 plant was plagued by reliability and maintenance problems from the beginning.
Raser says it’s victim of $100 million ‘joke’
Energy » Utah firm sues over its failed geothermal plant.
First Published Sep 24 2011 10:23 pm • Last Updated Dec 13 2011 11:41 pm

By Steven Oberbeck

The Salt Lake Tribune

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Only a few years ago, Provo’s Raser Technologies Inc. proudly boasted that its new Thermo 1 geothermal power plant near Beaver was poised to usher in a new era of energy production.

The plant, built in less than six months, used innovative technology that Raser said would allow it to profitably generate electricity from the geothermal industry’s Holy Grail — water wells that weren’t typically viewed as hot enough to produce commercial power.

"Our low-temperature technology can make geothermal a mainstream source of energy for the nation," Raser’s now former CEO, Brent Cook, said at a November 2008 ribbon-cutting ceremony for the flagship plant.

Since then, though, Raser hasn’t exactly turned the energy world upside down.

Burdened with an unmanageable debt load, Raser filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in bankruptcy courtearlier this year. And its Thermo 1 plant turned out to be a bust.

Today, the company that once portrayed itself as leading a geothermal revolution describes itself as the stooge in a cruel and costly joke, one centered around the very technology that it once proudly hailed.

Raser’s Thermo 1 plant — the company said it would be the first of many such facilities it intended to construct — was built using 50 small "PureCycle" generating units developed by UTC Power Corp., a subsidiary of Pratt & Whitney.

The units were described as operating similar to air conditioners, only in reverse. Hot water from the ground flowed into each unit and heated a fluid that vaporized and turned a turbine that generated electricity. The cooled water would then be pumped back underground for reheating.

story continues below
story continues below

Yet Raser now contends that the Thermo 1 plant from the beginning was plagued by reliability and maintenance problems and never was able to generate commercial amounts of electricity.

The revelations are contained in a fraud lawsuit filed in federal court in Delaware against UTCP and Pratt & Whitney. Raser launched the lawsuit shortly after its Chapter 11 reorganization plan was approved Aug. 30 by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in that state.

Raser’s Chapter 11 plan didn’t provide for any direct payment to the company’s unsecured creditors, who combined are still owed some $60 million.

However, the plan did call for the creditors to get a share of any money that Raser might recover from UTCP and Pratt & Whitney, said Douglas E. Spelfogel, a New York-based attorney who served as counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Raser reorganization.

And that could be a substantial amount if Raser is successful.

Raser claims that UTCP misrepresented the capabilities of the PureCycle units when it said they could be combined into a plant operation that could produce 10 megawatts of electricity.

Those UTCP misrepresentations, according to Raser, included assurances that such a generating plant could be operated remotely and that no personnel would be required on site. "In fact, a staff of over 10 persons has been unable to make the plant operate as it was supposed to operate," Raser said.

And that "joke," as Raser terms it, may have cost the Utah company and its shareholders more than $100 million.

"The multiple PureCycle units installed at the Thermo 1 plant were never able to generate the 10 megawatts of net output that the plant was intended to produce, and have had constant maintenance and reliability issues," Raser said in the suit. "As a result, the costs of generating even a reduced output have been so extraordinarily high as to make the plant not commercially viable."

Raser said it spent more than $100 million trying to make the plant function as UTCP represented it would.

And to make matters worse, Raser said Pratt & Whitney President Peter Christman toured the troubled plant after it was opened and stated that the idea of using PureCycle technology at Thermo 1 was "nuts."

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.