Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Feds threaten to sue Utah over union laws
Secret ballots » Feds say Constitution trumps union rules in 4 states.
First Published Jan 14 2011 04:33 pm • Last Updated May 04 2011 06:30 am

The National Labor Relations Board on Friday threatened to sue Utah, Arizona, South Carolina and South Dakota over constitutional amendments guaranteeing workers the right to a secret ballot in union elections.

The amendments conflict with federal law, which also gives employers the option of recognizing a union if a majority of workers sign cards that support unionizing, said Lafe Solomon, the agency’s acting general counsel.

At a glance

About the amendment

The amendment to Utah’s constitution approved by voters on Nov. 2 guarantees workers the right to secret balloting in union elections.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The amendments, approved by voters on Nov. 2, have taken effect in Utah and South Dakota, and will do so soon in Arizona and South Carolina.

Business and anti-union groups sought the changes, arguing secrecy is necessary to protect workers from union intimidation. They also are concerned Congress might enact legislation that would require employers to recognize the "card check" process in forming unions.

In letters to the attorneys general, Solomon said the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution preempts the amendments because they conflict with employee rights laid out in the National Labor Relations Act. That clause says that when state and federal laws are at odds, federal law prevails.

Solomon is asking the attorneys general in Utah and South Dakota for official statements agreeing that their amendments are unconstitutional "to conserve state and federal resources," rather than going to court.

Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said Friday he believes the state is on solid ground. He plans to coordinate a response with the other three states, rejecting the option of card-check elections.

"If they want to bring a lawsuit, then bring it," Shurtleff said. "We believe a secret ballot is as fundamental a right as any American has had since the beginning of this country. We want to protect the constitutional rights of all our citizens, including employees in the workplace."

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley also promised to "vigorously defend our South Dakota Constitution" against any federal lawsuit.

Unions long have pushed for the card-check legislation, but the effort hasn’t won enough support in Congress. Union officials say companies often use aggressive tactics to discourage workers from organizing unions.

story continues below
story continues below

Jim Judd, president of the Utah AFL-CIO, said incidents of union organizers pressuring workers are rare, but employer coercion is common and typically takes place well before any secret vote.

"Think about who has the power to coerce," Judd said. "Is it an outside union organizer? Or is it the business owner or manager who has the ability to hire, fire, demote, transfer or take other punitive actions?"

Judd said the federal agency’s letter threatening legal action comes as no surprise. He had predicted a costly lawsuit in testimony he gave during hearings on the proposed amendment last year. The law took effect Jan. 1.

Among those that pushed for passage of the state amendments was Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group that spent millions to back congressional Republicans in last year’s elections. Phil Kerpen, the group’s vice president for policy, said the federal action "shows how determined the board is to accomplish card check by backdoor means against the wishes of the American people and Congress."

Kimberly Freeman Brown, executive director of the pro-union group American Rights at Work, said the labor board was confirming that "these initiatives were intended to restrict workers’ rights to determine how they choose a union, disingenuously cloaked in the language of worker protection."

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.