Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Atheists lose court battle with IRS
A federal court has dismissed three atheist groups' suit against the IRS, in which they accused the tax agency of discriminating against nonreligious nonprofits.
American Atheists and its co-plaintiffs argued that tax-filing requirements for nonprofit atheist groups are unfairly tougher than they are for religious nonprofits. They contended that churches and other religious organizations should have to meet the same standards that other nonprofits meet in disclosing information on their donors, employee salaries and other details about the organization.
"We're going to keep fighting," American Atheists President David Silverman said after the U.S. District Court in Kentucky handed down its decision Monday. "The court has upheld a prejudiced government practice."
The atheists had argued that the IRS violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and the right to due process, guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. Generally, tax-exempt organizations must file a 990 financial form with the IRS, but religious and religious-related groups are exempted.
The court found that the atheists had no standing to bring the suit, in part because American Atheists could have applied to the IRS for designation as a religious organization, but never had. It's just speculation that the IRS would reject the application, the court wrote; in fact, the IRS has granted nontheistic groups status as religious nonprofits in the past.
"A review of case law establishes that the words 'church,' 'religious organization,' and 'minister,' do not necessarily require a theistic or deity-centered meaning," the court wrote.
The atheists held that to apply to the IRS for status as a religious organization would go against their principles.
The court wrote that the plaintiffs had failed to established that any concrete harm had come to them at the hand of the IRS. But the atheists had argued that they could raise far more money if they could tell their potential donors — as religious organizations may — that their names do not have to be disclosed on documents available to the public.
The plaintiffs argued that the American government unfairly subsidizes religious organizations that do not have to prove they do anything to benefit Americans. That special treatment costs $71 billion in annual tax revenue, the groups said.