Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Marriage: What’s love got to do with it? Historically? Very little

Valentine’s Day » Marrying for romance is a relatively recent phenomenon.



< Previous Page


For hundreds of years, marriage was a family affair, but in the later Christian era, it became about politics, property and posterity.

"If you could decide who could and couldn’t marry," she says, "that was a lot of power so governments and religions were very interested in controlling it."

At a glance

Adam & Eve, husband & wife

“And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

“And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

“And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.”

Genesis 2:22-25

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Again, love had little to do with it, which more often was associated with extramarital relations.

"Courtly love," which flourished among royalty in Europe from A.D. 1300 to 1500 was directed toward mistresses, Coontz says. "Love was such a transitory feeling, you couldn’t truly love anyone unless it was adulterous."

The ideal of love as a primary reason for marriage began to spread in the late 18th century and early 19th century, partly due to the French and American revolutions.

Enlightenment thinkers in this era were promoting the "right to personal happiness," she says.

Jane Austen, writing in the early 19th century, raised the question in her novels: Which is worse — a marriage with money but no love or marriage with love but no money?

"Somehow, her heroines always managed to fall in love," Coontz says, "with the guy with the money."

Eventually, the development of a wage labor economy moved coupling away from economics. Women didn’t have to depend on their parents’ ability to put up a dowry, and men didn’t have to wait for their inheritance. Families moved away from farms into urban settings, so they didn’t need so many children. More options opened up.

That created a sea change for marriage in the mid 19th century, including the possibility of unions founded on love, Coontz says. "We convinced ourselves that was the traditional ideal."


story continues below
story continues below

The postwar model • The most "marrying time in American history" was just after World War II, she says. "More women could stay at home full time, while their husbands supported them."

That was built on a combination of rising wages for men, Coontz says, and repressive laws and economics for women.

That era lasted only until the late 1960s and early ’70s, when women began flocking back to the workforce.

If these "Father Knows Best" marriages represented the ideal, says Herrin, the U. professor, why did so many women flee them in the late 1970s, when no-fault divorce became available?

"Our peak years for divorce were between 1978 and 1980," he says. "Even now 67 percent of divorces are filed by women. I am sobered by that [figure]. For a lot of folks, marriage is a better relationship for guys than women."

Today, Herrin says, romantic unions have become the ideal, but not all of them are between heterosexual, married couples with children. Many prefer cohabiting to marriage and do not plan to produce offspring.

Unlike earlier eras, these days Cupid’s arrow — the ineffable nature of attraction — is considered essential to finding a partner. You don’t have to have the approval of family, faith or society. You can write your own promises, make your own money, and chart your own future.

That’s the easier part, Herrin says. Making it last as a satisfying partnership is tougher.

Contemporary families are, indeed, falling apart, says the professor who teaches a class on "strengthening the family," and not because women work outside the home or gays are getting married.

It’s because young lovers don’t have the skills — the will and commitment to clean up the wife’s vomit, listen to the husband’s endless fascination with football, stay by her side when she gets fired, when he has Alzheimer’s, when they lose a child — to turn the initial spark into a deeper burning.

Love, he says, has a lot to do with that.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.