< Previous Page
By June of that year, Johnson had apparently arranged for thousands of dollars of contributions to Lee’s campaign. In an email that month, Swallow notified Johnson that checks to the Lee campaign from four of Johnson’s associates — which the report said totaled $9,600 — had bounced. Swallow forwarded the exchange to the Lee campaign, a suggestion, the report said, that Swallow was coordinating his efforts with the candidate’s campaign.
The report also revealed several new emails that showed Swallow’s intimate involvement in helping to coordinate the raising of hundreds of thousands of so-called "dark money" — unreported funds, moved through a series of nonprofits to avoid having to report the donors, many of which were payday lenders.
The U.S. Justice Department investigation
This time line shows the involvement of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Utah and the Department of Justice in the investigation of former Utah Attorney General John Swallow, which began in earnest after St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson made allegations against Swallow in January 2013.
Jan. 25 » The U.S. Attorney’s Office for Utah confirms it is investigating Swallow.
May 6 » The U.S. Attorney’s Office announces it is recusing itself from the Swallow investigation, leaving the probe to the Public Integrity Section of the U.S. Justice Department.
Sept. 12 » The U.S. Justice Department says it won’t prosecute Swallow.
March 13 » Two county prosecutors say they have uncovered evidence that may implicate U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Mike Lee of Utah in connection with the Swallow investigation.
Possible federal legal violations
Wire fraud » Using a phone or electronic communication (email) to facilitate a scheme involving a conflict of interest, bribery, accepting kickbacks in exchange for favors
Obstruction of justice » Any effort to impede, delay or influence the “administration of justice” by the federal government
Witness tampering » Forbids any and all conduct intended to alter testimony, influence or intimidate witnesses, potential witnesses or “any person” involved in a case
Evidence tampering » Forbids any attempts to “illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence,” including, but not limited to, altering documents, records and information
Document destruction » Knowingly changing, destroying, concealing or falsifying records, documents or any “tangible object” with the intent to block, alter or influence an investigation.
Rawlings and Gill declined to comment about specific allegations involving Lee and Reid, but noted their offices will "not ignore" any alleged breaches of Utah law.
"We do not have sufficient evidence to convict any United States senator of any state crime and our focus to date has not been on that prong of allegations," Rawlings said. "The current voluminous investigation into various state officials, associates or surrogates is not yet complete. It is our hope that the DOJ will re-engage related to any potential federal aspects of this case."
Federal crimes » The House committee report also suggested federal prosecutors may have dropped the ball in deciding not to prosecute Swallow for violating several federal laws in performing favors for well-connected supporters, damaging the integrity of his office and compromising the judicial system.
Swallow then covered up his alleged misdeeds, investigators said, by fabricating, altering and destroying damning documents.
Former federal prosecutors add Swallow may have committed more federal crimes than those detailed in the report, including wire fraud, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, evidence tampering and document destruction.
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim McConkie said Swallow may have committed acts that could amount to numerous federal charges of the same state crime.
"Every act of dishonesty or every time evidence was destroyed or deleted from a computer, that could be a charge," McConkie said. "The [federal government] really should open this case up again."
The same committee report alleged Swallow committed no fewer than eight state crimes — several of which he may have committed more than once.
"Typically if there’s a state corruption violation, you can find a federal equivalent," said former federal prosecutor Brett Parkinson, who now works in private practice.
Ex-federal attorneys also asserted that a government-led investigation — and prosecution — would ultimately do more to restore the public trust than one spearheaded by state or county agencies.
"There’s a different feeling to it in situations like this when it can be seen as a little incestuous in regards to the state doing an investigation headed by the Legislature then turning it over to a county prosecutor, all within the same system with similar ties and influence," Parkinson said. "When you have the federal government, there’s a separation."
Gill and Rawlings have said they will pursue any violations of state law, but cannot hold individuals accountable for federal breaches.
Maintained innocence » Swallow has maintained his innocence of all wrongdoing throughout the course of the House committee’s investigation and the county attorneys’ investigation.
His lawyer, Rod Snow, has pointed to the Justice Department’s refusal to prosecute the former top cop as proof his client committed no crimes.
In a letter to House investigators, Snow called their approach and allegations in the report "untrue" and "unfair."
Next Page >
Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.