Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Senate: No hearing for anti-discrimination bill
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2011, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

A bid to force a Senate committee hearing on a bill intended to protect gay and transgender Utahns from employment and housing discrimination failed on a party-line vote Monday.

Sen. Ben McAdams, D-Salt Lake City, tried the procedural move to force the hearing after it had been blocked in the Senate Rules Committee for more than three weeks.

McAdams said there is discrimination occurring and the consideration of SB148 would give gay and transgender Utahns hope and assurance the law will protect them.

"Some of you may worry about the controversy and hateful e-mails you might receive," McAdams said. "I believe the dialogue will be respectful and it will be constructive. … I refuse to accept that religious liberty is incompatible with protection of gay and transgender people in their home and on the job."

But Rules Committee Chairwoman Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, said that with 1,200 bill requests filed, not every one gets a hearing and McAdams shouldn't get special treatment.

Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, said he doesn't believe there's a problem that McAdams' bill would solve.

"I don't know why we try to press these things out like this when there isn't a demand for it," Buttars said.

McAdams' effort failed 21-7 on a party-line vote.

"There are reasons there should be exceptions to" anti-discrimination ordinances, said Senate President Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, who is a property manager. "A person who owns a duplex, for religious reasons, may not want to have someone in the other half of their duplex."

Pressed on what those reasons might be, Waddoups said he was only repeating what constituents had told him.

Waddoups said McAdams should thank the Senate for not allowing his bill to have a hearing, because he believes that the body could have rolled back the 11 community ordinances.

McAdams said he would still try to get a hearing for his bill but recognizes the chances of that happening this year are slim.

Article Tools

 Print Friendly
Photos
 
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.