Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Group sues over stream access
Recreation » Water act is unconstitutional, nonprofit says.
First Published Nov 12 2010 10:09 pm • Last Updated Nov 13 2010 10:51 am

Eight months after the governor gave life to a law that restricts the public’s access to Utah’s rivers and streams, a group has made a push to get back to the water’s edge.

The Utah Stream Access Coalition, a nonprofit group created to preserve public access to the state’s waterways, filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the constitutionality of Public Waters Access Act, which was passed by the Legislature in 2010.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The act countered a 2008 Utah Supreme Court ruling that waterways in the state are publicly owned, and put most streambeds crossing private lands off-limits unless anglers have a landowner’s permission.

Hundreds of residents called the Governor’s Office and sent e-mails, weighing in on the controversial legislation before it was passed.

The coalition’s lawsuit argues that since the state constitution guarantees public access to rivers and streams and limits the Legislature’s power to counter Utah Supreme Court decisions, the act is unconstitutional.

The act abandons a "fundamental principle of Utah law and prohibits public access to hundreds of miles of rivers and streams in Utah, many of which have benefited from publicly funded habitat restoration, stream bank restoration and other projects, and effectively gives riparian landowners exclusive rights to access and ... to sell that exclusive access to the highest bidder," the coalition writes in a press release.

The act is also unlawful by allowing property owners to prevent public access and law enforcement to penalize people using the state’s waterways, the lawsuit states.

Since the act went into effect, various members of the coalition have been chased off riverbanks, harassed by agents of riverside landowners and cited by law enforcement, the lawsuit states.

It specifically mentions incidents involving Victory Ranch, a Wasatch County development along the Provo River, and riverfront property owned by Silver Creek-Robert Larsen Investors. Both companies are defendants in the lawsuit.

The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and Wasatch County Sheriff Todd Bonner, who have cited or warned coalition members for trespassing, also are defendants.


story continues below
story continues below

The lawsuit asks that:

• public ownership of the state’s waterways be returned to the citizens of Utah.

• stream and river access be restored to the public.

• property owners be forbidden from impeding access to waterways.

• law enforcement stop penalizing those who use rivers and streams.

Rep. Mel Brown doubts the Legislature will make any changes on the act this upcoming session. He said the 2008 Supreme Court decision was not based on constitutionality but on statutes. "They file a suit, so be it," Brown said. "The Supreme Court in Utah needs to rule on it constitutionally and maybe this will force that. But in the meantime we are not going to let people just think they have the right to abuse private property without cause."

Sen. Dennis Stowell could not comment specifically on the suit because he had not read it. But he did say that going to court is a poor way to solve the problem because "it’s expensive for everybody and you never know what will come out of it."

"It’s much better if we can sit down and talk and find some common areas that we can work on," he said.

Stowell is co-chair, along with Brown, of the Utah Waterways Task Force, which he said is working to get more of the private areas of the streams open to anglers without violating the private property owner’s rights.

Ted Wilson, the governor’s senior adviser on the environment, said Herbert asked him to bring both sides together to avoid the courtroom. Wilson hopes the task force will be able to create a workable compromise on access.

"It’s a little disappointing to me that the anglers have gone ahead [with a lawsuit]," he said.

Sen. Ben McAdams, also a member of the task force, said he was interested in reviewing the suit. He voted against the act, saying from a policy perspective he wasn’t sure it accurately struck the proper balance between the rights of property owners and those of the public.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.
    Affiliates and Partners