Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Yosemite National Park drops plans to ban bike and raft rentals
San Jose, Calif. • In a major reversal, Yosemite National Park officials have dropped controversial plans to ban a wide variety of recreational activities in Yosemite Valley, including ending bike and raft rentals and tearing out swimming pools at the Yosemite Lodge and famed Ahwahnee Hotel.
The decision came after a yearlong battle in which more than 30,000 people commented on the park's plans to curtail recreation as part of a broader effort to restore natural conditions along the valley's Merced River. Many said the proposal went too far and penalized families who enjoy visiting the park -- an opinion echoed by several members of Congress.
"We really listened to what people had to say," said Kathleen Morse, Yosemite's chief of planning. "We spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to get it right."
The saga — which featured 14 years of legal battles — highlighted the near-impossible mission of the National Park Service: providing public recreation while preserving spectacular landscapes.
Under the revised Merced River Plan, a 3,000-page document unveiled Friday, the public can continue to rent bicycles and river rafts in Yosemite Valley, although the rental operations will be moved back from the river.
In addition to the swimming pools at the Yosemite Lodge and Ahwahnee being saved, the historic Sugar Pine stone bridge, built in 1928 and located behind the Ahwahnee Hotel, will also not be removed — as had been proposed to control erosion. Instead, parks officials will launch an engineering study to determine how to keep the bridge and reduce erosion.
At Curry Village, the ice rink will be removed as planned, but a temporary one will be put up in the parking area during winter months.
In general, environmental groups praised the revised plan, even though many supported some of the earlier actions, including removing the swimming pools.
"This is a great plan for the next 150 years," said Neal Desai, field director for the National Parks Conservation Association in San Francisco. "We supported reducing the clutter and streamlining operations. We're not getting everything that we want. But the Park Service is protecting iconic values and making sure that visitors have access and have a good experience."
The plan's biggest critic last year was Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Granite Bay, whose district includes Yosemite.
"The Park Service is hanging out a 'Tourists Go Home' sign," he said after the earlier plan was released.
On Friday, he said: "Although I remain concerned about some aspects of the plan, my first reaction is one of relief."
The new plan, which will cost $210 million over the next 15 years, also calls for other significant changes at one of America's most beloved national parks.
• Restoring 189 acres of meadows in Yosemite Valley.
• Increasing the number of Yosemite parking spaces by 8 percent, mostly by adding 300 spaces behind Yosemite Lodge and 300 spaces at El Portal, an area 3 miles west of the park entrance on Highway 140.
• Increasing the number of campsites in Yosemite Valley from 466 to 640. Many will be at Upper River and Lower River campgrounds, areas that were closed after a massive 1997 flood. Even with the new sites, however, there will still be significantly fewer campsites than the 872 that existed in the valley before the flood.