Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts

Arthur Chu’s winning strategy at ‘Jeopardy!’
Television » The show’s best-known champ defends the polarizing contestant.
First Published Feb 13 2014 01:25 pm • Last Updated Feb 13 2014 01:25 pm

It didn’t take long for Arthur Chu to become Public Game Show Enemy No. 1. Within days of his Jan. 28 debut on "Jeopardy!," the 30-year-old Cleveland-area insurance analyst was making America very, very angry. "Arthur Chu is the worst jeopardy contestant of all time," one viewer tweeted. "I can’t wait until someone beats his joyless, smug [expletive]," seethed another. Even the JBoard, normally a collegial hangout for the top-rated quiz show’s most dedicated ex-contestants and fans, got ugly. "There is no need to disrespect the game," one poster scolded Chu.

This all took me back to the heady days of summer 2004, when I began my own run as a "Jeopardy!" contestant and fans soon tired of my presence behind the leftmost podium. In ESPN the Magazine, Bill Simmons called me "a smarmy know-it-all with the personality of a hall monitor." (My company is, to this day, called Hall Monitor LLC.) On "Jeopardy!," a rigidly formatted show in its 30th year, the only real breath of fresh air is the endless parade of new contestants. Familiarity, on the other hand, quickly breeds contempt.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

It’s true that Arthur Chu is a buzzer-waver, a button-masher, a Trebek-interrupter. But between rounds of gameplay and in the many subsequent interviews he’s done — Chu is clearly enjoying his 15 minutes — he comes across as perfectly pleasant, chatty and self-aware. Given the low bar of "Jeopardy!"-contestant charisma, he is a normal, likable guy. The sudden wave of Chu-mosity is largely just a symptom of our modern news cycle, where one spate of hostile tweets can spawn a million repetitive reaction pieces before the feedback loop dies.

There’s an obvious racial angle as well. Chu, a bespectacled man with rumpled shirts and a bowl cut, plays into every terrible Asian-nerd stereotype you’ve ever seen in an ’80s teen movie. Charmingly, he seems to enjoy the role of the scheming outsider. In a recent Wall Street Journal interview, he pitted his own eccentric genius against me, "the angelic blond boy next door, the central casting ‘nice boy.’ "

But in fact, plenty of nice white boys on "Jeopardy!" have been pilloried by viewers for using Arthur Chu’s signature technique: bopping around the game board seemingly at whim, rather than choosing the clues from top to bottom, as most contestants do. This is Chu’s great crime, the kind of anarchy that hard-core "Jeopardy!" fans will not countenance. The technique was pioneered in 1985 by a five-time champ named Chuck Forrest, whose law-school roommate suggested it. The "Forrest bounce," as fans still call it, kept opponents off balance. He would know ahead of time where the next clue would pop up; they’d be a second slow.

More recently, skipping around the board has evolved into an art form. "Jeopardy!" luminaries like David Madden (19-game winning streak, 2005) and Roger Craig (Tournament of Champions winner and single-day winnings record holder, 2010-11) have used "the bounce" as a strategic way to hack an underappreciated key to "Jeopardy!" success: the Daily Double.

In any game of "Jeopardy!," three clues have been secretly earmarked as Daily Doubles. The player who finds each one can bet any or all of her winnings on responding to it correctly. By and large, "Jeopardy!" players are a risk-averse bunch. Unless a player is in need of a big comeback, the Daily Double wager is usually a smallish one.

Strategically, this is crazy. Like a poker player trying to increase the size of the pot when he has a good hand, "Jeopardy!" contestants should maximize their upside when the odds are in their favor. Historically, the odds of getting a Daily Double correct are very good: between 65 percent and 70 percent. Too many players instead let games come down to Final Jeopardy, where conversion is much less predictable. (Fewer than half of all Final Jeopardy responses are correct.) Finding the Daily Doubles becomes more important the stronger a player you are, since it lowers the influence of chance on the outcome. Crunching some numbers, I see that my own Daily Double conversion during my "Jeopardy!" run was about 83 percent. In hindsight, my wagers were almost always too small.

So when Arthur Chu bobs and weaves around the board, he’s chasing those game-changing Daily Doubles. Arthur Chu has been lauded in headlines as the pioneer of "Jeopardy!" "game theory," but Craig is the one who designed his own computer software from scratch to allow him to game "Jeopardy!" "moneyball"-style. Chu, by his own admission, just Googled "jeopardy strategy." If he has seen more Daily Doubles than other men, it is because he stood on the shoulders of giants.

Arthur Chu is on the "Jeopardy!" bench for a couple of weeks while a college tournament airs, but he’ll back on Feb. 24, and the Daily Double hunt will begin anew. In sports, players and fans love it when teams shake up the game with new techniques: the basketball jump shot in the 1950s, the split-finger fastball in the 1980s, four-down football today. Why should "Jeopardy!" be any different? Strategic play makes for a more complex, exciting show. Don’t listen to the Internet kibitzers. Arthur Chu is playing the game right.


story continues below
story continues below

Ken Jennings is a 74-time "Jeopardy!" winner from Utah and is the author of six books, most recently the "Junior Genius Guides."



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.