A day that seemed inevitable, with the scheduling of Michigan and the approaching annual series with a Big Ten opponent, finally came Tuesday.
The rivalry had been played annually since 1946 (and before, but was disrupted during World War II). Since Utah joined the Pac-12 in 2010, the idea of Utah and BYU not playing each year was a growing probability.
Scheduling Michigan, was the nail in the proverbial coffin. So, what do you think? Does this disruption reduce the significance of playing BYU? And do you believe it should be a priority for the Utes and Cougars to schedule one another in future years, especially now that we know it won't be an annual affair?
On the flip side: Does taking a break, in some way, lend stability to the rivalry?
— Bill Oram
|1.||Convicted killer Martin MacNeill survives jail suicide attempt|
|2.||Aron Ralston, who cut off arm to escape Utah canyon, jailed in Denver|
|3.||Witness to guide Idaho search for plane|
|4.||Permits for concealed guns: Utah hits 500K|
|5.||Guilt, pain, help and hope — when Mormon missionaries come home early|
|6.||I-15 reopens for motorists stranded near St. George|
|7.||Utah State football: Aggies fall bitterly short against Fresno State|
|8.||Susan Boyle says Asperger’s diagnosis was a relief|
|9.||Billy Joel, Shirley MacLaine, receive Kennedy Center Honors|