Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Here’s the gist of the letters from people facing eviction in Short Creek
The people facing eviction in Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Ariz., having been writing letters asking to remain in their homes, and they have received replies.
First, let's discuss the reply. Attorneys for the United Effort Plan have been sending a boilerplate letter explaining the minimum requirements of staying in a trust home in two towns, collectively known as Short Creek — $100 a month plus pay the property taxes. The letter also reminds people they have had plenty of notice over the years that these payments were required and that exceptions might be able to be made for anyone who applies as a "hardship" case.
A copy of the standard response is embedded. If you're reading this on a mobile device, you can click here.
As for the letters that spurred the replies, UEP employee Isaac Wyler said he has read them all. He declined to share them with me, but said those letters, too, seem somewhat standard. Wyler assumes members of the United Order, the subset of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints that still follow Warren Jeffs, were ordered to write letters emphasizing certain points.
According to an email summary Wyler sent me, the typical letter reads like this:
• 1. Our house was posted with a three-day notice to vacate, and we have nowhere else to go.
• 2. How can this happen in the United States of America? A country that guarantees freedom of religion.
• 3. We want to remain in this home, will you help us?
• 4. How can assets of our church be taken over by the state?
• 5. We have paid our taxes and will continue to do so if we are allowed to continue living here.
Wyler notes the letters omit whether any of the writers intend to pay.
We'll probably hear more about evictions at Saturday's community meetings.