Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Polygamy Blog
Nate Carlisle
Reporter Nate Carlisle and photographer Trent Nelson cover polygamy for The Salt Lake Tribune. You can follow the Polygamy Blog on Twitter at @tribunepolygamy. Follow Nate Carlisle on Twitter at @natecarlisle. Follow Trent Nelson on Twitter at @trenthead.

» E-mail Nate Carlisle

» Subscribe (RSS)

Robyn Sullivan and Christine, Kody, Meri, and Janelle Brown taste potential wedding cakes at a bakery in the TLC show "Sister Wives."
‘Sister Wives’ Brown family won’t seek money after polygamy decriminalization

The polygamous stars of the TV show "Sister Wives" are not seeking any money following a legal victory that decriminalized their lifestyle.

The Brown family — comprised of husband Kody and wives Robyn, Christine, Meri and Janelle — revealed in recently filed court documents that they will not seek "repayment of their moving costs, loss of contracts, or other expenses." The Browns sued in 2011 after Utah County prosecutors threatened to file criminal charges against them for living as polygamists.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

In December, U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups handed a victory to the Browns, ruling that Utah’s law against cohabitation — which was the primary tool prosecutors could use against practicing polygamists — was unconstitutional.

Prior to Waddoups’ ruling, the Browns had not revealed whether they planned to seek financial damages. The issue then came up during a hearing in January.

In the new court documents, the Browns’ attorneys write that while the family suffered as a result of Utah’s now-defunct cohabitation law, "they believe strongly that the focus of the case should be on the Court’s historic ruling and not their insular losses." In a footnote, the documents add that the Browns reserve the right to seek attorneys fees in the case. Their lawyers — including Washington D.C.-based Jonathan Turley and Utah-based Adam Alba — have been working for free.

There are currently no hearings scheduled in the case. Any appeal of Waddoups’ ruling by the Utah Attorney General’s Office is on hold until after state attorneys respond to the Browns’ latest court filings. The Utah Attorney General’s Office has said it has yet to decide if it will appeal.

—Jim Dalrymple II

Twitter: @jimmycdii

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.