Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Polygamy Blog
Nate Carlisle
Reporter Nate Carlisle and photographer Trent Nelson cover polygamy for The Salt Lake Tribune. You can follow the Polygamy Blog on Twitter at @tribunepolygamy. Follow Nate Carlisle on Twitter at @natecarlisle. Follow Trent Nelson on Twitter at @trenthead.

» E-mail Nate Carlisle

» Subscribe (RSS)

(Salt Lake Tribune file photo) The women in this 1944 photo are front row, L -R, Melbay Finlayson, Jean Barlowe Darger, Marie Beth BArlow Cleveland, Mary Mills, Juanita Barlow; back row, L - R, Leona Jeffs, Myrtle Lloyd, Rhea Allred Kunz, Mabel Finlayson.
You know someone who is gay, but do you know a polygamist?

Since the U.S. Supreme Court made largely favorable rulings for gay marriage last month, there has been hope in some quarters, even predictions, that polygamy is next.

The thinking, by people favoring polygamy and opposing it, seems to be the court has started a slippery slope, and the slope’s next ledge is allowing plural marriage.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Maybe that is where the law is going. But I see one big political science difference between gay marriage and polygamy.

It’s said one thing that boosted gay marriage supporters is the personalization of the issue. Gays and lesbians came out, expressed their love for their partners and shared their stories with friends and family. This was so effective, some are wondering if this form of sharing can bolster other social causes.

It helps, of course, when the petitioners have the manpower to reach so many people. Which is where polygamists have a problem.

You can find gay people everywhere. Polygamists? It’s a small group. And at the moment, people on the left and right can find something they don’t like about them.

Sure, some television shows have introduced us to polygamists. But that’s different than the unlikely scenario of someone in Maryland or Iowa celebrating Thanksgiving and having a niece or nephew say that he or she is a polygamist. And I don’t see many threesomes or foursomes lining up on the steps of San Francisco’s city hall waiting for the mayor to marry them.

So how about it? If polygamists were to make more personal connections, would that influence public opinion of plural marriage? Tell us below or on our Twitter account.

— Nate Carlisle

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.