Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Polygamy Blog
Jim Dalrymple II and Trent Nelson
Reporter Jim Dalrymple II and photographer Trent Nelson cover polygamy for The Salt Lake Tribune. You can follow the Polygamy Blog on Twitter at @tribunepolygamy. Follow Jim Dalrymple II on Twitter at @jimmycdii. Follow Trent Nelson on Twitter at @trenthead.

» E-mail Jim Dalrymple II

» Subscribe (RSS)




Kody Brown, right, with "sister wives" Christine, left, Meri, Robyn and Janelle. The Brown family says Utah's bigamy statute is unconstitutional and is suing the state. (Courtesy Joe Pugliese for TLC)
Will the ‘Sister Wives’ show for court?

UPDATE: Kristyn Decker will meet with her group, called the Sound Choices Coalition, 3 p.m. Thursday at the federal courthouse in Salt Lake City. That’s 30 minutes before the Browns’ hearing. Decker is a former polygamist wife who is now a polygamy opponent. Decker’s press release does not say whether this will be a protest, but Decker has criticized the Browns’ attempts to decriminalize polygamy.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Original post:

On Monday, I wrote a story previewing Thursday’s court hearing in the Brown family lawsuit against the state of Utah.

But I haven’t received an answer as to whether the plaintiffs — the stars of the television show "Sister Wives" — will appear in the courtroom.

The family, Kody and wives Meri, Janelle, Christine and Robyn, all of whom are listed as plaintiffs, skipped a July 13, 2011, hearing at the federal courthouse in Salt Lake City. But back then, Lehi police and the Utah County Attorney’s Office were still investigating the Browns for bigamy. That investigation prompted the Browns to move to Nevada.

Eventually, prosecutors decided to not file charges. That may have been a factor in why Meri Brown in September participated in a 5-kilometer walk benefiting people leaving polygamy.

Practically speaking, there’s not much reason for the Browns to appear Thursday. The hearing will essentially be arguments between lawyers over the merits of the state outlawing plural marriage and whether that violate’s constitutional rights. Witnesses will not be called. A trial is a ways off and the judge is unlikely to issue any important ruling from the bench on Thursday.

But, hey, the Browns aren’t necessarily averse to publicity. And the Browns and some other polygamists, including the Dargers, have gone to great lengths to humanize plural marriage.

So who knows? Pay attention Thursday afternoon.

— Nate Carlisle

Twitter: @natecarlisle



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
 
Jobs
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.